Many people see Dusk as having a lukewarm market performance, but this precisely indicates the core issue—it's not relying on hype or concepts to survive.
Since 2018, Dusk has bet everything on one hypothesis: that future on-chain activity won't be virtual assets and sentiment trading, but real-world assets, genuine business rules, and complete data that can withstand audits.
This decision shapes the entire product design logic. Zero-knowledge privacy proofs are not meant to evade regulation but to protect user data while enabling compliance requirements to be genuinely implemented. An auditable on-chain mechanism means institutional investors can confidently participate—they're most afraid of data black boxes, not privacy. The modular architecture design also leaves ample room for large-scale applications of RWA and compliant DeFi.
In essence, Dusk's market performance is like pricing financial infrastructure. It doesn't rely on marketing hype or concept bombardment but repeatedly tests whether its structure is stable.
When the entire market finally understands that "being sustainably usable" is more valuable than "being short-term hype," Dusk's position in this ecosystem will be truly reevaluated. By then, it might be too late.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWizard
· 8h ago
Really, with Dusk's quiet way of making big money, someone will regret it sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 8h ago
Projects that operate quietly often end up laughing the loudest in the end. The RWA track truly needs this kind of no-nonsense infrastructure.
Only when institutions really step in will retail investors realize it.
Low profile ≠ lack of strength; Dusk's move is quite aggressive.
Another good thing that the market has mispriced; it's just that most people only look at the concept.
Honestly, on-chain data that can be audited is the real necessity for institutions, more appealing than any marketing buzzwords.
That's why I say that truly profitable projects never need to flood the market with daily updates.
For compliant DeFi to rise, infrastructure like Dusk will inevitably catch up, and it's still in the accumulation phase.
Zero-knowledge proofs are used to create an audit loop, not hide-and-seek; the idea is crystal clear.
When RWA truly explodes, these overlooked projects will prove themselves, and it will be too late to regret then.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 8h ago
Unremarkable projects are often the real deal; this logic is actually quite harsh.
Real applications > Concept hype, but the market often goes the other way.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 8h ago
Bro, I understand this logic. Being steady and not overly aggressive actually shows strength, and it's much more reliable than projects that promote marketing and calls for attention all day long. Truly capable projects don't need to flood the screens every day.
Many people see Dusk as having a lukewarm market performance, but this precisely indicates the core issue—it's not relying on hype or concepts to survive.
Since 2018, Dusk has bet everything on one hypothesis: that future on-chain activity won't be virtual assets and sentiment trading, but real-world assets, genuine business rules, and complete data that can withstand audits.
This decision shapes the entire product design logic. Zero-knowledge privacy proofs are not meant to evade regulation but to protect user data while enabling compliance requirements to be genuinely implemented. An auditable on-chain mechanism means institutional investors can confidently participate—they're most afraid of data black boxes, not privacy. The modular architecture design also leaves ample room for large-scale applications of RWA and compliant DeFi.
In essence, Dusk's market performance is like pricing financial infrastructure. It doesn't rely on marketing hype or concept bombardment but repeatedly tests whether its structure is stable.
When the entire market finally understands that "being sustainably usable" is more valuable than "being short-term hype," Dusk's position in this ecosystem will be truly reevaluated. By then, it might be too late.