As a product manager, I often wonder: besides issuing tokens and trading NFTs, what real-world problems can blockchain solve? The biggest bottleneck is quite clear—there's a lack of convenient privacy tools.



Recently, I delved into Dusk's "XSC" (Confidential Smart Contracts) system and understood what they are doing. In simple terms, they have created a "privacy application engine" for developers.

What are the benefits? Developers no longer need to grapple with obscure cryptography papers. Dusk has already encapsulated the underlying PLONK zero-knowledge proof algorithm, allowing you to inject privacy capabilities into your dApp just like building with LEGO bricks.

Take on-chain surveys as an example. On a regular public chain, all answers are exposed, making the data essentially useless. But with XSC, it's different—I can set rules to let participants encrypt their responses, and the smart contract can automatically aggregate data like "how many people have an annual income over 500,000," and even generate encrypted proofs. The coolest part is that everyone can verify the credibility of this statistical data, but no one can see any individual participant's specific answers.

Once this "verifiable privacy aggregation" module is set up, it can be reused in countless scenarios such as voting, auctions, credit scoring, and data mining.

The positioning of Dusk tokens is very clear: deploying and running privacy contracts costs DUSK, and users paying for privacy transaction fees also use DUSK. The entire economic model forms a closed loop.
DUSK77,28%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 8h ago
Remember, the true bottom range appears during times when no one cares. After crossing cycles in the privacy track, there will eventually be a day when value returns. --- Honestly, this is what blockchain should be doing, not those pump-and-dump schemes. Conservation of energy—someone has to pay for privacy. --- Another day of being taught a lesson by the market, but the phoenix will always be reborn. Let's wait and see the opportunities in privacy infrastructure. --- When will DUSK rise? My mindset is almost beyond repair [smile]. --- Building privacy capabilities like LEGO blocks, just hearing about it sounds promising. It would be great if we could still wait for the dawn. --- Falling to this extent actually reveals who is truly working. Trust in it—bear markets cultivate the right mindset. --- Verifiable privacy aggregation? Sounds like the next hot trend, but the key is whether we can survive until that day. --- Having experienced the 2018 crash, I still believe in the logic of these projects. It’s just exhausting. --- Everyone stay calm, the economic model is a closed loop, it’s time to think from a different perspective—this is an opportunity to build positions. --- Privacy tools are indeed a bottleneck, but who will pay? That’s the real issue. Patience and wait.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 16h ago
Lego-style privacy solution, it seems Dusk is doing serious work. Finally, it's not just another token issuance scam.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedianvip
· 16h ago
Finally, someone has clarified this matter. Privacy tools are indeed a genuine need, not just a new trick to fleece users. The Lego bricks analogy is perfect, making privacy accessible even for us cryptography novices, so we don't have to go bald reading papers. The example of an annual income exceeding 500,000 is interesting. If there's no true privacy on-chain, what's the point of sharing this data? Just go naked. Wait, is this closed-loop model really feasible, or is it another "perfect story"?
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 16h ago
Hmm, this privacy contract idea is indeed interesting, but will it really work in practice... --- Wait, can PLONK be used directly once it's wrapped up? That sounds a bit too idealistic. --- I'm convinced by the privacy aggregation verification in the questionnaire, but will developers really burn DUSK for this? --- Honestly, privacy tools are indeed scarce, but whether Dusk can run this closed-loop economic model remains to be seen. --- Building privacy like LEGO blocks? Uh... the pitfalls of cryptography are much deeper than you think. --- Voting, auctions, credit scoring... sound very attractive, but what about user education? Who will pay for it? --- The demand for DUSK tokens is clearly written, but I don't know if it can support the valuation. --- Verifiable and private—this really solves a real problem, deeper than most public chains think. --- I understand this logic, but why does it feel like Dusk has been silent... what exactly is the team working on?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 16h ago
Now we've found the true proposition of blockchain: privacy tools are indeed a necessity. But can Dusk's XSC really be used on a large scale, or is it just another impressive-sounding solution that no one actually uses?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 17h ago
The LEGO bricks analogy is brilliant; finally, someone has explained complex things clearly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 17h ago
The privacy questionnaire example is good, but the real question is—how many projects dare to run this on the mainnet? Most are still in the "conceptual stage," right?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)