2026-01-18 08:23:15

The financial system has always been caught in a dilemma: on one side, wanting complete transparency to build trust and improve efficiency; on the other side, needing to keep secrets for trade secrets, privacy protection, and compliance requirements. In areas like cross-border settlements, securities trading, and derivatives, this contradiction is especially acute.

Dusk Network aims to address this fundamental tension—achieving what traditional finance cannot through technological means: "Controlled Transparency."

The key lies in redefining what transparency means. In conventional approaches, transparency either means full disclosure of information or access limited to a few privileged institutions, both extremes problematic. Dusk's approach is different—using zero-knowledge proofs and cryptographic techniques to create a third mode: transaction details are encrypted externally, but compliance and authenticity can be independently verified without any trust assumptions.

To put it more plainly, each transaction or asset status is accompanied by a sealed, auditable digital record. For example, in a cross-border bond transaction, all terms and fund flows are encrypted and stored, and any authorized auditor (such as through a regulatory key mechanism) can verify that the transaction fully complies with all relevant jurisdictional regulations—while the business details remain confidential.

The benefits of this approach are obvious: it reduces information asymmetry risks while protecting necessary commercial privacy; it enables automated compliance checks and reduces delays and errors caused by manual intervention.

DUSK74,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenApeSurfer

· 6h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing. Basically, they allow you to prove that you know a secret without revealing it. Traditional financial players should have learned this long ago.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 16h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but when it comes to actual implementation, how can we prevent the regulatory key mechanism from being abused? That's the real key question. --- Controllable transparency sounds like trying to have both fish and bear paws at the same time. I suspect the actual complexity in operation might be seriously underestimated. --- From the source code perspective, Dusk's approach indeed transforms the dilemma faced by traditional finance, but who should control the auditing authority needs to be clarified. --- An interesting discovery is that this mechanism is still using keys to define who has the right to see what. Essentially, it doesn't solve the problem of centralized power. --- Honestly, the idea of automating cross-border bond trading compliance is somewhat idealistic. The actual complexity of coordinating multiple jurisdictions might be far beyond expectations. --- Key question: what if the authorized auditing party itself is compromised or colludes? No matter how strong zero-knowledge proofs are, they can't solve this human problem. --- Wait, isn't this just using technology to package information isolation? Why not just say it's encryption isolation? Why call it controllable transparency? --- Theoretically, this can reduce manual intervention, but who is responsible for maintaining the underlying key infrastructure? Has the operational cost been considered?

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 16h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty mysterious, but whether they can be truly implemented depends on whether they can break down the barriers of those interest groups... Dusk's approach is indeed interesting, but will the traditional financial folks cooperate like that... Controllable transparency sounds great, but the key is who holds the "regulatory key," the power center just moves somewhere else Honestly, no matter how fancy the cryptographic solutions are, it ultimately depends on execution; otherwise, it's just a PPT project If it can really solve those messy cross-border settlement processes, I’ll consider it promising

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 16h ago

NGL, zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty good, but how many institutions are really willing to adopt them in practice? Isn't this just about giving old-school finance a "blockchain exterior"? The logic seems a bit convoluted. Controlled transparency? It sounds like trying to have it both ways. Feels even more complicated than now... These traditional finance folks are always thinking about how to have their cake and eat it too. Isn't Web3 all about doing exactly that? Zero-knowledge proofs are cool, but the regulatory key mechanisms feel strange—still centralized. I just want to know, if truly decentralized, can this system still work? Automated compliance sounds great, but in reality? Just like previous promises, it ends up being messed up. Honestly, this architecture looks decent, but I bet five bucks it will end up being a total mess in practice. Controlled transparency... sounds nice, but in reality, it's still those people playing power games.

View OriginalReply0