Buying flowers may seem simple, but it actually reflects a deeper logic—the right to actively choose.
It's quite ironic when applied to the digital world. Our most valuable assets—memories, creativity, assets—are repeatedly entrusted to various platforms for safekeeping, like constantly renting someone else's vase. This situation needs to change.
One idea worth paying attention to is turning data into programmable, living objects. Imagine being able to set permissions for your family album that only family members can decrypt, or having an AI dataset that automatically transfers you a payment each time it's used. It sounds like science fiction, but technically it's entirely feasible.
Walrus Protocol is doing this. It has built a data infrastructure with the core logic of using WAL tokens to drive the entire ecosystem—serving as both a payment tool and a staking and governance credential. Interestingly, over 60% of the tokens were initially allocated to the community, meaning the network's growth benefits directly flow to users.
We are in an era of explosive AI data, where data needs to flow, trade, and collaborate, but the prerequisite must be clear ownership and a trustworthy neutral layer. Only then can creators' value truly return to themselves, rather than being absorbed by platforms.
Instead of continuing to rent, why not cultivate your own data garden?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 7h ago
60% community allocation, I have to hold back on this point. Historical data shows that this type of pattern is prone to becoming a guise for cutting leeks. How can we ensure from a technical perspective that the funds truly flow to the users and not early whales snatching up the tokens? Be cautious when getting on this wave.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 7h ago
Damn, someone finally said it. We really do feel like we're just working for big corporations.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMom
· 7h ago
Data sovereignty is really something that should be taken seriously, but can Walrus's logic be implemented? Or is it just another concept?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 7h ago
It's the same "sovereignty" narrative again, sounds good but I just want to ask—when the time comes, who will be willing to relinquish power?
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 7h ago
The renting mentality really needs to be broken, and the issue of data sovereignty should have been taken seriously long ago.
Buying flowers may seem simple, but it actually reflects a deeper logic—the right to actively choose.
It's quite ironic when applied to the digital world. Our most valuable assets—memories, creativity, assets—are repeatedly entrusted to various platforms for safekeeping, like constantly renting someone else's vase. This situation needs to change.
One idea worth paying attention to is turning data into programmable, living objects. Imagine being able to set permissions for your family album that only family members can decrypt, or having an AI dataset that automatically transfers you a payment each time it's used. It sounds like science fiction, but technically it's entirely feasible.
Walrus Protocol is doing this. It has built a data infrastructure with the core logic of using WAL tokens to drive the entire ecosystem—serving as both a payment tool and a staking and governance credential. Interestingly, over 60% of the tokens were initially allocated to the community, meaning the network's growth benefits directly flow to users.
We are in an era of explosive AI data, where data needs to flow, trade, and collaborate, but the prerequisite must be clear ownership and a trustworthy neutral layer. Only then can creators' value truly return to themselves, rather than being absorbed by platforms.
Instead of continuing to rent, why not cultivate your own data garden?