2026-01-18 09:26:56

Without strict moderation policies, platforms risk losing control over their ecosystems — or so the argument goes. But here's the tension: increased censorship might maintain order, yet it fundamentally conflicts with decentralized web principles. As traditional platforms tighten oversight, the appeal of permissionless blockchain-based alternatives grows stronger. Web3 enthusiasts argue that true control shouldn't rest with centralized gatekeepers, but rather distributed across networks. The debate reflects a deeper struggle between stability and freedom in digital spaces.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHarvester

· 5h ago

Regulation and freedom are really a deadlock; you can't have both. Wait, centralized platforms do censorship and then run Web3? How is this logic so clear... Speaking of which, which is more valuable—stability or freedom? That's the real hardcore question.

View OriginalReply0

FunGibleTom

· 5h ago

Bro, this contradiction really hits home. If you regulate too strictly, everyone runs to Web3; if you regulate too loosely, you're worried about a blow-up. We're just stuck in the middle.

View OriginalReply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 5h ago

That's the problem. Centralization insists on regulation, which instead pushes people onto the chain.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 5h ago

This is a dead loop. The stricter the regulation, the more users run away. They end up being freer on the chain, and then traditional VCs come in to cut the leeks... --- To put it simply, centralized people don't want to relinquish power, but users have long been tired of being controlled. --- A classic example: the more you regulate, the more chaotic it becomes. This is probably the reason why blockchain exists. --- Laughing to death, centralized players think there's no order, but we are having a great time on the chain. Can't we just be our own masters? --- The core issue is not about how much regulation there is, but who holds the voice. Ultimately, it's a matter of the decentralization of power.

View OriginalReply0

BankruptcyArtist

· 5h ago

This is a deadlock. To establish order, power must be delegated; to have freedom, chaos must be endured. You can't have both.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 6h ago

Regulation and freedom, indeed, are a deadlock. But speaking of which, can Web3 truly decentralize control? It still seems like new centralization will emerge. Instead of worrying about regulation, it's better to see who can survive until the end.

View OriginalReply0