Holding static native BNB may seem safe, but in fact it depreciates invisibly. This statement may be harsh, but the mathematical logic on the chain cannot be refuted.



The root of the problem is simple: rewards for BSC validator nodes continuously flow to stakers, increasing the coins in their hands while your coin count remains unchanged. The result is that your purchasing power is diluted. This is a form of implicit inflation, just most people haven't noticed.

Is there a way to hedge? Yes. Interest-bearing assets like slisBNB are the answer. It’s not just a simple token but a form of asset that can grow automatically—the exchange rate will increase unidirectionally as the rewards on the chain accumulate. In other words, holding it means you are "extracting" benefits from native BNB holders. This sounds like arbitrage because it essentially is.

The best part is that the liquidity and functionality of slisBNB are basically the same as native BNB. It can be staked, traded, and integrated into applications, providing a completely consistent user experience. In a rational market, who would stick to an option with the same function but no compound interest?

In the long run, the evolution of on-chain assets is already very clear. Native BNB will eventually become purely a Gas fuel, while interest-bearing assets like slisBNB will become mainstream financial tools. Early deployment of the $LISTA ecosystem and slisBNB is essentially aligning with this major trend of asset evolution.
BNB-0,05%
LISTA-6,06%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SurvivorshipBiasvip
· 7h ago
Wake up, holding unstaked BNB is just losing money. This logic makes perfect sense.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 7h ago
Holding BNB and doing nothing is slow suicide. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 7h ago
On-chain data shows that the dilution logic is indeed plausible, but the problem is that I haven't fully understood the exchange rate mechanism of slisBNB... I checked the contract code late at night, and an interesting point is that the assumption of a one-way increase is a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxietyvip
· 7h ago
Really, holding onto BNB is like slow self-destruction. How did I not think of this logic... --- slisBNB has some tricks, it's like earning passively from others' dilution? --- Wait, should I exchange the native BNB I hold... --- That's why big players are all playing with yield-bearing assets, and I'm still foolishly hodling bare coins. --- The question is, is there enough liquidity? I'm worried I might get stuck and can't get out later. --- Got it, got it, it's just letting the coin generate more coins, right? Nice. --- But what if slisBNB rug pulls? The native BNB at least has consensus. --- On-chain mathematical logic can't refute this statement—it's brilliant. Why didn't I think of the dilution issue? --- So it's not too late to enter slisBNB now, right? --- I'm a bit convinced, but I'll observe for now.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 7h ago
Damn, this is the kind of honest truth that people who hold onto BNB the most don't want to hear.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)