Many people misunderstand the sexiness of blockchain. In the eyes of true financial players, TPS is just a vanity metric; what really matters is "Finality"—once a transaction is confirmed, it can never be reversed.



Currently, Web3 is still proud of "6 block confirmations," but little do they know, for institutional investors handling massive funds, this is a joke. "Probabilistic security" is not just a technical term; for risk control departments, it’s a nightmare. That’s why Dusk Network’s underlying design caught my eye—it aims to break down the most stubborn T+2 settlement barrier in traditional finance.

You might not have thought about it: when you buy stocks, your money is actually frozen for a full two days until the settlement is complete. How big is the counterparty risk during these two days? What is the capital occupation cost? Dusk uses a combination of partitioned Byzantine protocols and simple proofs—two hardcore technologies—to do something extremely bold: achieve instant finality.

Sounds like black tech? Actually, the logic is straightforward. On Dusk Network, the validator committee typically verifies a block in just 15 seconds, and once verified, it’s final: no forks, no rollbacks, no endless confirmation waiting. Transactions are settled instantly—this is a dream for any compliant platform. The original two-day clearing process is compressed into 15 seconds. What’s released is not just time, but liquidity.

When transactions are legally settled within seconds, the risk associated with high-frequency trading clearing essentially disappears. This is the real ace of RWA—it's not just about putting asset documents on-chain, but about using technology to fundamentally transform backend settlement.

My judgment is: Dusk’s ultimate goal is not to become a faster general-purpose public chain, but to serve as a decentralized clearing hub. In an era of low interest rates and high inflation, capital efficiency determines everything. Whoever turns T+2 into T+0 will control the lifeblood of institutional funds. Dusk holds this key and is already standing at the gate of traditional finance.
DUSK46,31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwichvip
· 01-18 09:59
Complete settlement in 15 seconds? Damn, if that's true, the institutions will be fighting over it like crazy.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 01-18 09:52
Someone finally explained clearly, the TPS hype definitely needs to stop. T+2 to T+0? If that could really be achieved, institutions would just vote with their feet. But on the other hand, 15-second confirmation sounds great, but is the Byzantine model really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-18 09:45
Hey, finally someone said it. The vanity of TPS really needs to be awakened from. T+2 to T+0? Now that's the logic of making money; everything else is just talk. The point about finality hits hard. Institutional investors are just buying into this, and Dusk's approach does have some substance. The question is, can 15 seconds be stable? Don't tell me it's another "revolutionary" technology being hyped up again. But on the other hand, if they really eliminate the two-day liquidation window, the liquidity release would indeed be a major event. These people finally realize that the core of finance isn't TPS but settlement efficiency. Better late than never. It sounds good, but it still depends on whether institutions will actually adopt it. Having technology without adoption rate is just for show. I agree with the statement about RWA's trump card. On-chain assets are useless; process transformation is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 01-18 09:37
Someone finally explained it clearly: TPS's vanity really should go bankrupt. Switching from T+2 to T+0 is the real deal; the institutions are most into this. But whether 15 seconds can really hold up depends on how Dusk executes. The RWA surge is indeed happening.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretfulvip
· 01-18 09:36
Finally, someone said this. TPS and such really just scam retail investors; institutions don't care at all. Wait, can a full resolution be achieved with just 15 seconds of confirmation? If that's true, traditional trading gains are in trouble. Switching from T+2 to T+0 sounds great, but can risk control really hold up? But speaking of which, relying solely on technical solutions isn't enough, right? The regulatory side... alright, I'll get on board first and see. What I care about is whether this system will truly avoid probabilistic failures. If there are issues with second-level settlement, the risks are much greater than with two-day settlements. I agree with the author's logic. Capital efficiency is the key to victory, not some flashy data. Honestly, the last part is a bit too optimistic. How could Dusk so easily transform financial infrastructure?
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholarvip
· 01-18 09:34
Complete settlement in 15 seconds. If this can truly be implemented, traditional finance should sleep poorly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)