Ethereum founder recently sparked heated discussions in the community—he candidly raised a provocative question: Is the current development direction pushing Ethereum into the "protocol obesity" trap?
Specifically, his core concerns are threefold. First, no matter how powerful the node network and cryptographic protections are, if the protocol code becomes bloated and difficult to understand, it will undermine its trustless nature—users cannot verify what they trust, and it no longer truly represents decentralization. Second, the development process lacks a "garbage collection" mechanism; new features are continuously piled on, making the protocol increasingly heavy. Finally, he believes the upgrade pace should be slowed down, giving the protocol ample time to stabilize, allowing those redundant features to naturally phase out.
From another perspective, isn't this a wake-up call for the entire public chain track? Can richness of features and system simplicity truly coexist? Or have we already seen many L1 projects become difficult to maintain due to feature bloat?
The next step for the ETH ecosystem may depend on whether developers can find this balance—simplicity does not mean lack of functionality, but smarter trade-offs. What do you think of this viewpoint?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 6h ago
To be honest, the issue of protocol bloat should have been exposed long ago; it has been drowned out by the wave of feature stacking.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 6h ago
Protocol obesity is a very accurate description, really, watching a bunch of useless features being added one by one, who the hell can verify all of them?
---
I just want to know when we can start cleaning up these redundancies... more features don't necessarily mean more awesome.
---
That hits hard, but someone has to dare to say it.
---
So much for less is more, now it's more is more...
---
Slowing down sounds good, but who can keep up with the ecosystem? It's really a dilemma.
---
Simplicity has indeed been overlooked, but once you compromise, there's no turning back.
---
Every upgrade feels like stacking code; if this continues, maintainability will truly become a hidden danger.
View OriginalReply0
LightningAllInHero
· 6h ago
That's right, ETH is indeed a bit bloated now.
Once the stacking feature starts, it can't be stopped, and in the end, no one can maintain it.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 6h ago
Hmm... that really hits home. The analogy of protocol bloat is spot on.
But on the other hand, can we really slow down? The projects in the ecosystem just can't wait...
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 6h ago
The term "protocol obesity" is actually spot on; I hadn't thought of it this way before...
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 6h ago
Basically, the more features piled on, the harder it becomes for anyone to understand the code. That's true centralization—if no one can verify it, then what are you really trusting?
Ethereum founder recently sparked heated discussions in the community—he candidly raised a provocative question: Is the current development direction pushing Ethereum into the "protocol obesity" trap?
Specifically, his core concerns are threefold. First, no matter how powerful the node network and cryptographic protections are, if the protocol code becomes bloated and difficult to understand, it will undermine its trustless nature—users cannot verify what they trust, and it no longer truly represents decentralization. Second, the development process lacks a "garbage collection" mechanism; new features are continuously piled on, making the protocol increasingly heavy. Finally, he believes the upgrade pace should be slowed down, giving the protocol ample time to stabilize, allowing those redundant features to naturally phase out.
From another perspective, isn't this a wake-up call for the entire public chain track? Can richness of features and system simplicity truly coexist? Or have we already seen many L1 projects become difficult to maintain due to feature bloat?
The next step for the ETH ecosystem may depend on whether developers can find this balance—simplicity does not mean lack of functionality, but smarter trade-offs. What do you think of this viewpoint?