2026-01-18 11:28:03

SUI and ZAMA are both good, just different approaches.

SUI is already running — the ecosystem is active, with real users and developers working, and the foundation is stable.

ZAMA is a high-risk, high-reward gamble. It targets the privacy track, core infrastructure positioning, and the project is still in early stages. The potential is large, but so are the uncertainties.

In the short-term momentum, SUI is indeed more advantageous. However, both paths have their supporters.

SUI-11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CounterIndicator

· 3h ago

SUI is indeed very competitive right now, with the ecosystem's activity level being prominent. However, I think ZAMA's focus on privacy has been underestimated; it all depends on who can survive until that day.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 14h ago

SUI is indeed stable, but I still want to place a bet on ZAMA

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 14h ago

I still prefer Sui's fundamentals, Zama's privacy track is too volatile.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 14h ago

Sui has indeed gained momentum now, but who is really using Zama's privacy-focused approach?

View OriginalReply0

Tokenomics911

· 14h ago

SUI is indeed stable this time, and the ecosystem is really moving. But I'm also tempted by ZAMA's gamble; if privacy really takes off, it will be incredible.

View OriginalReply0