U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent believes the Supreme Court won't challenge President Trump's tariff policies. Speaking on CNBC, Bessent emphasized that tariffs represent core economic strategy, not legal overreach. He noted the court typically avoids interventions that would undermine presidential economic authority. This stance signals confidence in the administration's trade agenda staying intact—a crucial factor for markets watching potential inflationary impacts and capital flows across sectors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShadowStaker
· 8h ago
lol bessent really out here betting the court stays outta executive turf... interesting gambit considering how unpredictable these things actually get. tariffs as "core strategy" tho? feels like political framing tbh. markets gonna care way more about actual inflation data than supreme court tea leaves anyway ngl
Reply0
AirdropLicker
· 8h ago
Ha, trying to back Trump again? Does the court really dare to challenge his tariff plans?
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 8h ago
Is this guy Bessent reassuring the market, or does he really have so much confidence in that group of Supreme Court justices?
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmer
· 8h ago
Tariff policy courts are unlikely to take action; this is basically a gamble on the boundaries of power.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 8h ago
Tariffs, huh? On the one hand, it's called an economic strategy; on the other hand, it's basically betting that the Supreme Court won't dare to act... They really dare to do it.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent believes the Supreme Court won't challenge President Trump's tariff policies. Speaking on CNBC, Bessent emphasized that tariffs represent core economic strategy, not legal overreach. He noted the court typically avoids interventions that would undermine presidential economic authority. This stance signals confidence in the administration's trade agenda staying intact—a crucial factor for markets watching potential inflationary impacts and capital flows across sectors.