The shift from human developers to AI developers is happening faster than most people realize. What once required teams of engineers can now be orchestrated through intelligent agents. It's not about replacing humans—it's about amplifying what's possible. The tools are getting smarter, the workflows are getting leaner, and the bottleneck has moved somewhere else entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Whisperer
· 11h ago
NGL, this tone always sounds comfortable, but the real bottleneck is not the tool itself—it's people's decision-making ability... It's easy for AI to write code, but setting requirements?
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 11h ago
Wow, now programmers are really going to lose their jobs. They keep saying "it's not a replacement," but I've heard that line too many times.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 12h ago
Wow, now developers are really going to be unemployed. It's just talk about not replacing humans, just listen to it.
View OriginalReply0
HashBandit
· 12h ago
ngl this hits different when you realize it's exactly what happened to mining back in 2017... we had teams optimizing rigs, now it's just ASICs running the show. the "bottleneck moved elsewhere" thing? yeah, it moved to your power bill. ask me how i know lmao
The shift from human developers to AI developers is happening faster than most people realize. What once required teams of engineers can now be orchestrated through intelligent agents. It's not about replacing humans—it's about amplifying what's possible. The tools are getting smarter, the workflows are getting leaner, and the bottleneck has moved somewhere else entirely.