When market power concentrates in too few hands, the whole game changes. Fewer participants means fewer competing bets, and when that happens, decision-making becomes increasingly centralized. This concentration risk isn't just an economic footnote—it shapes everything from pricing power to innovation incentives. The dominance of major tech players demonstrates exactly how dangerous it becomes when alternatives shrink and market choices consolidate. It's a pattern worth watching across any industry, but especially critical in spaces where decentralization was supposed to be the answer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainGriller
· 11h ago
Damn, isn't this just highlighting the current awkward situation of Web3... Where's the promised decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 12h ago
NGL, that's why we need Web3... but now Web3 itself is also being quickly monopolized by big capital, quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 13h ago
On-chain data shows that the concentration of top wallet addresses has reached a new high. Isn't this exactly what the article mentioned... The fate of centralization. The interesting part is that everyone is shouting about decentralization, yet when deploying contracts, there's not even a multi-signature setup.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 13h ago
Centralized entities, no matter how they are rebranded, cannot escape the fate of monopoly. The irony of Web3 lies here.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 13h ago
It's really ironic. Web3 advocates decentralization, but now it's become so competitive... one giant dominates, and retail investors still have to watch their faces.
When market power concentrates in too few hands, the whole game changes. Fewer participants means fewer competing bets, and when that happens, decision-making becomes increasingly centralized. This concentration risk isn't just an economic footnote—it shapes everything from pricing power to innovation incentives. The dominance of major tech players demonstrates exactly how dangerous it becomes when alternatives shrink and market choices consolidate. It's a pattern worth watching across any industry, but especially critical in spaces where decentralization was supposed to be the answer.