Bitcoin wants to become a reserve asset for central banks, but the reality is clear—its capacity is still far from enough.
If it were large economies like China, Russia, or the European Union, they would have already offloaded 2-3 trillion USD worth of US bonds and moved into gold. After all, gold has a market value of 20 trillion USD, and such large-scale capital inflows and outflows can be fully absorbed. But what about Bitcoin? With a market cap of 2 trillion USD, this size clearly cannot handle such volume.
It is precisely because of this that last year, gold became the main choice for "great powers to move away from the US dollar"—which can be seen as a micro-strategic adjustment for gold.
Interestingly, gold vs. Bitcoin is not a binary choice. Under the trend of asset diversification, the two are likely to be viewed as complementary rather than competitive. As the market develops, you will see these two asset classes each occupying their own position in central bank asset allocations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OvertimeSquid
· 13h ago
20 trillion really can't withstand the scale of a major country's funds... Gold is different, with a 20 trillion market cap, the central bank can easily move a few hundred billion without any pressure.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 13h ago
A market cap of 20 trillion definitely can't compete with gold; the gap is obvious.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 13h ago
20 trillion compared to US bonds, that's a bit naive to play like that. Gold's market value crushes ours.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 13h ago
20 trillion definitely can't withstand the scale of the central bank's buying power, that's the reality.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 13h ago
Oh my god, 20 trillion really can't withstand that level of sell-off... Gold still won after all.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 13h ago
Speaking of which, with BTC's market cap only at 2 trillion, if the central bank really starts pouring money in, it definitely can't hold up... need to wait a bit.
Bitcoin wants to become a reserve asset for central banks, but the reality is clear—its capacity is still far from enough.
If it were large economies like China, Russia, or the European Union, they would have already offloaded 2-3 trillion USD worth of US bonds and moved into gold. After all, gold has a market value of 20 trillion USD, and such large-scale capital inflows and outflows can be fully absorbed. But what about Bitcoin? With a market cap of 2 trillion USD, this size clearly cannot handle such volume.
It is precisely because of this that last year, gold became the main choice for "great powers to move away from the US dollar"—which can be seen as a micro-strategic adjustment for gold.
Interestingly, gold vs. Bitcoin is not a binary choice. Under the trend of asset diversification, the two are likely to be viewed as complementary rather than competitive. As the market develops, you will see these two asset classes each occupying their own position in central bank asset allocations.