There's a growing perception that major global forums have become somewhat contradictory in their mission. Critics point out that these organizations often bring together the very Western institutions and corporations whose policies contributed to the problems they're now supposedly addressing. As one observer notes, there's an inherent tension when the same players who shaped existing global challenges are positioned as the solution-makers. This dynamic raises questions about whether institutional reform can truly be effective when the reformers are part of the system itself. The gap between stated intentions and actual representation continues to fuel skepticism among those watching how these organizations actually operate and whose interests they ultimately serve.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ServantOfSatoshi
· 12h ago
Basically, it's digging your own hole and filling it yourself. This kind of trick really takes the cake.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 12h ago
Basically, it's a bunch of problem creators turning around and selling solutions, hilarious...
Isn't this just a replica of current DeFi governance? Should have seen it clearly long ago.
Stakeholders auditing themselves? Wake up, everyone.
The system itself is rotten; hoping that people within the system will fix the system is a pipe dream.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 12h ago
lmao the irony is so thick you could stake it... same dudes who built the casino now selling you the "house edge fix" 💀 ngl this reads like watching a ponzi scheme rebrand itself as a dao
There's a growing perception that major global forums have become somewhat contradictory in their mission. Critics point out that these organizations often bring together the very Western institutions and corporations whose policies contributed to the problems they're now supposedly addressing. As one observer notes, there's an inherent tension when the same players who shaped existing global challenges are positioned as the solution-makers. This dynamic raises questions about whether institutional reform can truly be effective when the reformers are part of the system itself. The gap between stated intentions and actual representation continues to fuel skepticism among those watching how these organizations actually operate and whose interests they ultimately serve.