Blackrock ETHA Draws $11.75M as Ether ETFs Outpace Bitcoin on July 27

BTC-1.68%
BHYP-3.36%
Key Takeaways
  • Blackrock ETHA attracted $11.75 million on July 27, leading ether ETF inflows amid bitcoin outflows.
  • Ether ETFs drew $9.23 million in net inflows while bitcoin ETFs recorded $11.64 million in outflows.
  • Institutional capital has become selective, favoring ether exposure over bitcoin and HYPE fund products.

Blackrock's ETHA ether ETF attracted $11.75 million on July 27, leading the ether ETF category to $9.23 million in net inflows while bitcoin ETFs recorded $11.64 million in outflows. The divergence marked the third consecutive day of bitcoin withdrawals and reflected selective institutional demand favoring ether exposure. Ether ETFs have shown consistent inflows over the past week as investors rotate capital toward alternative crypto products.

Bitcoin ETFs Record Third Consecutive Day of Outflows

Bitcoin ETFs posted $11.64 million in net outflows on Monday, July 27. Only two bitcoin funds reported net activity. Blackrock's IBIT recorded an $8.82 million withdrawal, while Fidelity's FBTC lost $2.82 million. No bitcoin ETF attracted fresh capital during the session. Total trading value reached $1.34 billion, while combined net assets closed at $78.71 billion.

Ether ETFs Draw $9.23 Million Led by Blackrock ETHA

Ether ETFs moved in the opposite direction. The category drew $9.23 million, led by an $11.75 million addition to Blackrock's ETHA. A $2.52 million withdrawal from Invesco's QETH reduced the final total. Ether ETF trading value reached $775.34 million, and net assets ended the day at $10.65 billion.

Ether ETFs inflow chart Ether ETFs have seen consistent inflows over the past week. Source: Sosovalue

Giselle Lai, Director, Digital Assets Strategist at Fidelity International, told Bitcoin.com News that bitcoin is often the first stop for institutions entering the crypto market. She said ETFs are lowering the barrier to entry and helping large investors make more informed allocation decisions, rather than simply encouraging them to buy or sell bitcoin.

Solana and XRP ETFs Post Modest Gains

Solana ETFs attracted $1.03 million, with most of the capital going to Bitwise's BSOL. Total trading value was $39.55 million, while net assets closed at $889.31 million.

XRP ETFs added $592,470. The entire inflow went to Franklin Templeton's XRPZ. Trading value across XRP products reached $12.66 million, with combined assets holding at about $1 billion.

HYPE ETFs Extend Losses With $2.89 Million Outflow

HYPE ETFs recorded $2.89 million in net outflows, extending a difficult run that has followed its strong launch period. Bitwise's BHYP lost $2.24 million, while 21Shares' THYP posted a withdrawal of about $658,940. HYPE ETF trading value reached $12.82 million, and net assets fell to $279.22 million.

Monday's figures showed that institutional capital has become more selective, favoring ether and measured altcoin exposure while bitcoin and HYPE funds work through renewed selling pressure.

FAQ

What were the net flows for bitcoin ETFs on July 27?

Bitcoin ETFs recorded $11.64 million in net outflows on July 27. Blackrock's IBIT posted an $8.82 million withdrawal, and Fidelity's FBTC lost $2.82 million. No bitcoin ETF attracted fresh capital during the session.

How much did Blackrock's ETHA ether ETF attract on July 27?

Blackrock's ETHA attracted $11.75 million on July 27, leading the ether ETF category to $9.23 million in total net inflows for the day.

What did Fidelity International say about bitcoin ETFs?

Giselle Lai at Fidelity International stated that bitcoin is often the first stop for institutions entering the crypto market, and that ETFs are lowering the barrier to entry and helping large investors make more informed allocation decisions.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments