CoinFund Managing Partner David Pakman identified a persistent challenge in cryptocurrency: token values remain disconnected from the economic performance of the networks they represent. Pakman argued that many native crypto tokens are driven by narratives and social media activity rather than business fundamentals, creating uncertainty for contributors deciding between immediate payment and speculative token exposure. He proposed that early-stage projects pay contributors in stablecoins to attract talent preferring predictable compensation, and suggested clearer regulation could eventually strengthen the relationship between governance tokens and network value.
Pakman Proposes Stablecoin Payments to Address Contributor Compensation Mismatch
Pakman said contributors who expect a network to grow substantially may welcome payment in native tokens, but noted many younger participants now prefer quicker and more predictable financial outcomes instead of speculative long-term positions. To address this mismatch, Pakman proposed that early-stage projects consider paying contributors in stablecoins. He said doing so could make participation more attractive for developers and other contributors who do not want to speculate on the future value of a project's native asset.
Pakman Cites Ethereum Mining Experience as Positive Token Incentive Model
Pakman drew on his own experience mining Ethereum, explaining that holding ether proved rewarding as its value appreciated. He added, however, that most projects have failed to deliver similar long-term returns for contributors who received native tokens. Pakman pointed to Ether.fi as an example where investors would expect a governance token to have a meaningful relationship with the success of the underlying network.
Pakman Links Proposed Clarity Act to Future Governance Token Certainty
Pakman said the proposed Clarity Act could provide regulatory certainty that strengthens the connection between governance tokens and network value in the future.
FAQ
What problem did David Pakman identify with crypto token values?
Pakman stated that crypto token values remain too disconnected from the underlying economic performance of the networks they represent, driven instead by narratives and social media activity rather than business fundamentals.
Why does Pakman propose paying contributors in stablecoins?
Pakman proposed paying contributors in stablecoins to attract talent that prefers predictable compensation over speculative token exposure, making participation more attractive for developers and other contributors who do not want to speculate on future token values.
How does Pakman view the proposed Clarity Act's impact on tokenomics?
Pakman said the proposed Clarity Act could provide regulatory certainty that strengthens the relationship between governance tokens and network value in the future.