Gillibrand: Crypto Bill Requires Ethics Provision Amid Trump Ties

CryptoFrontier
TRUMP4.24%
MELANIA3.24%
WLFI-0.16%

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand stated on Wednesday at the Consensus Miami conference that there will be no deal on sweeping cryptocurrency market structure legislation without an ethics provision, citing concerns over President Donald Trump and his family’s crypto connections. Gillibrand, one of the bill’s most prominent advocates, emphasized that members of Congress, senior administration officials, presidents, and vice presidents must not be allowed to profit from crypto industries based on insider status.

Trump and Family Crypto Holdings

Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, launched memecoins ahead of the inauguration, and his family has led the DeFi and stablecoin project World Liberty Financial. Bloomberg has estimated that Trump has raked in at least $1.4 billion from his crypto ventures. Trump’s crypto interests have faced scrutiny over potential national security and foreign influence risks following an investment tied to the United Arab Emirates, with the House launching a probe into World Liberty Financial.

Stablecoin Compromise and Legislative Progress

A bill to comprehensively regulate the crypto industry at the federal level has been stuck in the Senate over recent months. The main blocker centered on the treatment of stablecoin rewards, which Gillibrand said has been resolved after Sens. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., reached a compromise that could clear the way for a markup this month.

Ethics as Emerging Hurdle

Earlier this year, the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced its version of the crypto bill without Democratic support, citing Trump’s crypto interests as a major obstacle. Democrats in that committee proposed amendments that would block the president, vice president, lawmakers, and other federal officials from making certain financial transactions involving digital assets, but these were not included in the bill.

Meanwhile, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott has said ethics is not within the panel’s jurisdiction. Gillibrand stated she is working with both Democrats and Republicans, as well as the White House, to ensure ethics language is included.

“It is essential — and I want everyone in this room to take this to heart — there will be no one voting for this bill if we don’t have an ethics provision,” Gillibrand said on Wednesday. “The truth is that we cannot allow members of Congress, senior administration officials, presidents, or vice presidents to get rich off these industries because of their insider status.”

She added: “We are working really hard to get the agreement by Republicans and by allies in Congress, and also through the White House so that this provision will be part of this bill, or it will not go forward. We cannot let greed and corruption in Washington tear this industry down, and without that provision, that’s exactly what will happen.”

Consumer Protection and Timeline

Gillibrand also said there is a push for consumer protection language in the bill, including around illicit finance and anti-terrorism funding. A bill could get passed into law before the August recess, she said.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal told The Block at Consensus that he is “very confident” that a crypto market structure bill will pass before the summer ends.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
AutumnSlopePathvip
· 05-08 01:00
The Clarity Act was originally expected to be passed this year, but now it looks like it will be delayed again—Washington's old script.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightShellPoolvip
· 05-07 14:38
Restricting officials from long-term industry connections is beneficial for the healthy development of the industry in the long run, but how to implement it effectively is the real challenge. Looking forward to detailed rules.
View OriginalReply0
MinersUnderTheNeonBridgevip
· 05-06 21:32
Gillibrand's move is ruthless, directly bringing the president into the scope of restrictions, it seems she wants to block the revolving door.
View OriginalReply0
FomoLibrarianvip
· 05-06 21:17
The Democratic Party's internal attitude towards crypto is becoming increasingly divided. Gillibrand is trying to add a fuse to the bill.
View OriginalReply0
0xLateAgainvip
· 05-06 21:17
Clarity Act: At this point in negotiations, where exactly is the balance between industry interests and government regulation?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-35b998a0vip
· 05-06 20:30
5~300 character random distribution test: short.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e6dafce6vip
· 05-06 17:35
Can't even touch the president? Then how do we consider the NFT and DeFi projects from Trump's family before? Do we trace them?
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolPicnicvip
· 05-06 17:30
Gillibrand is bundling anti-corruption and crypto regulation together, and her negotiation skills are good.
View OriginalReply0
PettyLpvip
· 05-06 17:26
It seems both parties are using crypto as leverage, and the actual legislative efficiency has become even lower.
View OriginalReply0
MevStreetPhotographervip
· 05-06 17:26
If this clause is truly implemented, the lobbying costs in the crypto world will have to double.
View OriginalReply0
View More