Justin Sun Sues Trump's World Liberty Financial Over Frozen Tokens

CryptoFrontier
TRX0.49%
WLFI-0.16%

Tron (TRX) founder Justin Sun filed a lawsuit against World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency project supported by US President Donald Trump, alleging that the WLFI project team froze his tokens without valid reason and stripped him of voting rights. The lawsuit was filed in California federal court, and tensions between Sun and the Trump-backed project have escalated following public statements from Eric Trump, Donald Trump’s second son.

Eric Trump’s Response

Eric Trump, WLFI co-founder, responded to Sun’s lawsuit by comparing it to what he described as an absurd purchase. Trump stated that Sun’s lawsuit was as ridiculous as “paying $6 million for a banana taped to a wall.” His comments underscored the WLFI team’s dismissal of the legal action.

WLFI’s Position

The WLFI team rejected Sun’s case as baseless, characterizing it as a “desperate” attempt at public sabotage. While the team accused Sun of unspecified irregularities, no specific details regarding these allegations were provided.

Sun’s Allegations

According to the lawsuit, Justin Sun alleges that World Liberty Financial took three specific actions against him: freezing his tokens without valid justification, stripping him of his voting rights in governance proposals, and threatening to permanently burn his tokens.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
BoredInBlockspacevip
· 04-26 12:39
If WLFI can provide KYC/risk control trigger records, then Sun might not get the advantage.
View OriginalReply0
AutumnSlopeCabinvip
· 04-25 12:38
Sun's lawsuit in California this time is quite clever; jurisdiction and the chain of evidence are both crucial.
View OriginalReply0
PuppyLooksAtTvlvip
· 04-24 12:00
First, review the contract terms to see if the project team has specified clear freezing conditions.
View OriginalReply0
ViewingNarrativesFromAHotAirvip
· 04-24 04:10
Projects that support Trump also dare to do this? The compliance risk is directly maxed out.
View OriginalReply0
NonceNomadvip
· 04-23 13:22
This melon is a bit big, freezing tokens still deprives voting rights?
View OriginalReply0
L2Mailmanvip
· 04-23 13:13
TRX here isn't exactly a friendly party, but freezing someone else's voting rights is indeed unseemly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9076f8b9vip
· 04-23 12:59
If true, WLFI's governance design is a ticking time bomb: whoever controls the contract permissions is the king.
View OriginalReply0
BluePeonyPrincipalProtectionvip
· 04-23 12:59
If freezing assets without proper justification, it feels like a typical power struggle over governance rights.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bee672a5vip
· 04-23 12:56
I'm more concerned: how exactly is on-chain voting power "deprived"? Is it due to multi-signature changes or are snapshots excluded?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4aa73916vip
· 04-23 12:49
Politics + crypto + litigation, the three-piece set, the market is about to be driven by emotions again.
View OriginalReply0
View More