Charles Schwab partners with Cboe to launch S&P 500 forecast contracts.

The product uses a binary options structure, allowing clients to bet "yes or no" on whether the S&P 500 index's closing price will be above or below a specified level.
The contracts will be listed on the Cboe exchange and settled based on the S&P 500 closing price at expiration.
Charles Schwab plans to roll out to clients in the coming months, pending regulatory and operational finalization.

Schwab CEO Rick Wurster previously criticized sports or entertainment event contracts for blurring the lines of investment.
This collaboration strictly limits itself to financial events, rejecting political and sports betting.
Cboe will also launch the "Plus Zone" feature simultaneously, where even if the prediction direction is correct but the target price is not hit exactly, partial payouts are possible.

On the same day, Kentucky's Attorney General filed three lawsuits against Kalshi and Polymarket, accusing them of operating illegal sports betting platforms without a gambling license.
A federal judge in Michigan ruled that sports prediction markets are outside the jurisdiction of the CFTC.
Parties are also engaged in litigation in Kentucky courts over a 14.25% prediction market transaction tax.

Wall Street is taking a compliant route, while on-chain platforms face state-level crackdowns.
Will these two paths eventually merge into a unified regulatory framework, or will a parallel ecosystem form—"traditional financial compliant prediction markets vs. on-chain native prediction markets"?

My judgment: short-term parallel, long-term convergence.

The involvement of Schwab and Cboe essentially redefines prediction markets within a compliant framework.
Their products are regulated derivatives, not gambling.
Schwab has 50 million clients managing over $11 trillion in assets.
When these clients can trade S&P 500 event contracts directly within brokerage accounts, the "first-mover advantage" of on-chain prediction markets will be quickly diluted.

The problem with on-chain platforms is jurisdiction ambiguity.
CFTC considers event contracts as federally regulated swaps, while states see them as illegal gambling.
The tug-of-war between federal and state authorities will not end soon, and this uncertainty itself is a source of risk.
Users dislike uncertainty.

But on-chain prediction markets have an advantage that traditional finance cannot replicate: permissionless access.
Schwab’s products are only available to its clients, requiring KYC, accounts, and compliance checks.
Polymarket and Kalshi are open to global users without needing brokerage accounts.
This difference will not disappear.

So, in the short term, these two lines will coexist—one compliant, regulated, targeting US retail clients; the other decentralized, permissionless, targeting global users.
They serve different audiences.

But in the long term, these lines may converge.
The reason is simple: liquidity will flow to places with lower compliance costs.
If Schwab and Cboe’s products succeed, more traditional financial institutions will follow, standardization of event contracts will increase, trading costs will decrease, and liquidity will concentrate.
If on-chain platforms cannot resolve regulatory uncertainty, liquidity will gradually diminish.

Nasdaq has previously submitted a rule proposal for binary options on the Nasdaq 100 index.
Traditional exchanges are systematically integrating event contracts into mainstream financial tools.
When event contracts on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 can be traded with a single click within brokerage accounts, ordinary users will have no reason to go to on-chain platforms—unless they are trading political events or sports.

This is precisely the breakthrough opportunity for on-chain platforms.
Schwab explicitly rejects political and sports betting, which are the largest sources of trading volume for Polymarket and Kalshi.
If on-chain platforms can maintain the "non-financial events" niche while addressing regulatory compliance, they can still survive in areas traditional finance cannot reach.

Hyperliquid previously launched a CPI prediction market, allowing users to bet binary outcomes on macroeconomic data using USDC.
If Schwab and Cboe’s S&P 500 contracts succeed, on-chain platforms will follow with more macro data contracts—GDP, non-farm payrolls, PCE—areas not fully covered by traditional finance.
The regulatory window for on-chain platforms may open precisely through these "financial events yet to be standardized by traditional finance."

Schwab’s entry itself is a more powerful tool for regulatory reform than any lobbying effort.
Regulators find it hard to reject Schwab and Cboe but can easily crack down on Polymarket.
But this may not be bad for on-chain prediction markets—once Wall Street legitimizes "prediction contracts," the space for on-chain platforms to pursue compliance could open up.
Not through confrontation, but by demonstrating that this category is a valuable financial instrument.

#嘉信理财携手Cboe推标普预测合约