BTC_POWER_LA

Do you want to use the power law without acknowledging it? Just mention the 200 days moving average.
There is no reason why this average would mean anything if there was not an underlying pattern that is rooted in the physics of Bitcoin. Moving averages are meaningless unless there is a real pattern that the moving averages point to.

The most valuable structures in the universe are networks.
Living organisms are networks of cells exchanging nutrients and building materials. The brain is a network of specialized cells exchanging information and coordinating action.
Cities are networks of humans—each with advanced cognitive abilities—working together to improve living conditions, advance science and technology, and deepen our understanding of the world.
Is it any surprise, then, that a network of networks—Bitcoin—has already reached a value in the trillions of dollars, and may one day represent a significant portion of glo

Some of my readings right now.

From the Physics of Bitcoin book. Debasement of Roman Coinage.

Such a fascinating video—twenty people engaging in elaborate mental gymnastics to argue that death is somehow “good.”
It really highlights how deeply conditioned we are. From early childhood, we’re immersed in a cultural narrative that normalizes—and often even glorifies—death as something natural, necessary, or meaningful. That belief becomes so ingrained that questioning it feels almost taboo.
Breaking out of that mindset is incredibly difficult, because it’s not just an idea—it’s a societal enchantment, reinforced by philosophy, religion, and tradition.

Visibility graph with negative and positive price. Interesting signal.

We applied the visibility graph to the daily slopes of the power law. How one can say that there is a decay of the power law?
Do you see with your own eyes how stable the slopes are?
They oscillate around a clear mean and the visibility graph confirms this.

Nodes degrees of freedom of the visibility graph for Bitcoin. Notice how the graph is decreasing in time demonstrating a smaller absolute volatility of the price.

From @Snz_BTC. We went through this like 1000x.

The power law emerges even when we use addresses with different wallet balances.
This is another signature of scale invariance.
Three address tiers were constructed:
•Shrimps = total non-zero balance addresses (the full dataset)
•Crabs = addresses holding ≥1 BTC = (1–10 BTC) + (10–100 BTC)
•Dolphins = addresses holding ≥10 BTC = (10–100 BTC) only
________________________________________
Panel 1 — N(t) vs time, log-log
Each tier is plotted as log₁₀(addresses) vs log₁₀(t_days). An OLS linear regression on these log-transformed values gives the power law exponent n for each tier — the slope of

The power law emerges even when we use addresses with different wallet balances.
This is another signature of scale invariance.
Three address tiers were constructed:
•Shrimps = total non-zero balance addresses (the full dataset)
•Crabs = addresses holding ≥1 BTC = (1–10 BTC) + (10–100 BTC)
•Dolphins = addresses holding ≥10 BTC = (10–100 BTC) only
________________________________________
Panel 1 — N(t) vs time, log-log
Each tier is plotted as log₁₀(addresses) vs log₁₀(t_days). An OLS linear regression on these log-transformed values gives the power law exponent n for each tier — the slope of