ShizukaKazu

#SpaceX暴跌16%市值蒸发4000亿 Sudden Crash! SpaceX Plummets from Highs, a New Round of Reshuffling in the Crypto World Officially Begins!
The extreme ups and downs of the capital markets are vividly demonstrated through SpaceX. Previously, driven by the dual hotness of AI + space race sectors, SpaceX soared after listing on NASDAQ, causing countless investors to chase the rally madly. But in just a few days, the market completely reversed, staging an epic collapse that not only shook the global tech stock market but also directly impacted the entire crypto market's funds and sentiment.
As of the latest trading session, SpaceX (SPCX) plummeted 16.4% in a single day, with its market capitalization evaporating over $400 billion. Looking at a longer cycle, the destructive power of this decline is even more astonishing: in just three trading days, the total market value shrank by over $927 billion, a retracement of 31.3% from its all-time high. Even though the current stock price remains 14.5% above the IPO price, the panic from the high-altitude plunge has already thoroughly swept through the venture capital market.
The core trigger for this crash is SpaceX’s latest financing move. The company just announced the issuance of unsecured senior notes, planning to raise at least $20 billion for future business expansion. Interestingly, publicly available data shows it holds over $100.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Despite ample cash flow, aggressive debt financing has led the market to question its valuation logic, with the overvaluation bubble risk concentrated and a collective sell-off by institutions triggered.
For crypto investors, this wave of market movement is not just a simple US stock fluctuation but a critical signal affecting the overall trend, directly rewriting the short-term crypto market trajectory.
First, risk capital is significantly diverted to safe assets. The US stock and crypto markets share the same global risk capital pool. Previously, a large amount of hot money active in the crypto space had flooded into SpaceX’s space race hype. Now, as high-tech valuations collectively retreat, institutional funds are shifting to risk aversion mode, continuously reducing crypto holdings, directly suppressing Bitcoin and mainstream altcoins’ upside potential, and intensifying market volatility and shakeouts.
Second, market speculative sentiment is rapidly cooling down. The recent surge in SpaceX was fundamentally driven by hype around AI and space themes, closely resembling the speculative logic of many concept coins in the crypto space. The valuation bubble burst has made capital less willing to pay for “long-term stories,” significantly reducing speculative preferences for sectors. Many crypto assets with no real-world application and purely conceptual hype will face ongoing valuation compression.
Finally, panic sentiment continues to spread across the market. Currently, global financial markets’ risk appetite is weakening, compounded by the chain reaction of SpaceX’s massive retracement, and the crypto market has entered a cautious wait-and-see cycle. Leveraged funds are fleeing to safe assets, trading activity has decreased, and a sustained rebound in the short term is unlikely.
Ultimately, SpaceX’s collapse is an inevitable return of the overvaluation bubble. For the crypto market, this wave of market movement signifies the end of short-term speculative gains and the market’s official shift toward de-bubbling and focusing on fundamentals. The subsequent trend is likely to continue wide-range fluctuations, with high-risk tokens still having room to retreat. At this stage, blindly bottom-fishing is highly discouraged; prioritizing risk mitigation by avoiding purely conceptual coins, safeguarding mainstream assets, and strictly controlling positions are the most prudent trading strategies right now. $SPCX

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U World Cup Preview: The Twilight of Aztec Giants Mexico and the Final Charge of Eastern European Iron Cavalry Czech
As the Czech team steps onto the turf of the Aztec Stadium, they will face not only a host team that has already qualified early but also a temple carrying the faith of football and a nation that has embedded the sport into its bloodline.
Mexico City, 9 a.m. Beijing time, June 25 — The bowl-shaped roof of the Aztec Stadium will once again capture the roar of one hundred thousand people. This "Great U.S. Urrutia" built in 1966 has been the stage of Pelé’s divine status and Maradona’s "Hand of God," and now it welcomes another historic moment — the host Mexico facing a life-and-death battle against the Czech Republic.
After two rounds, the situation in Group A is clear.
Mexico has won both matches, defeating South Africa 2-0 and Korea 1-0, accumulating 6 points and securing the top spot in the group early, becoming the first team in this World Cup to advance to the Round of 32. No goals conceded in two matches, their defense is rock-solid. Under the guidance of "Basque" Aguirre, this Mexican team continues the steady style of the North and Central American champions — unbeaten in the last 10 matches.
Czech Republic, on the other hand, stands on the edge of a cliff. They were overturned 1-2 by Korea in the first match, and drew 1-1 with South Africa in the second, only earning 1 point from two games. This Eastern European team, which advanced through the playoffs with great risk, led in both matches but failed to hold onto the victory — leading but not playing well afterward has become their greatest weakness.
Such desperation often brings out the most terrifying potential. In their last 8 games, Czech has 4 wins, 3 draws, and 1 loss, only losing to Korea; they have scored in 8 consecutive matches, averaging 2.3 goals per game. Syk, Souchak, and Fafar — these names mean that this team has never lacked the gene for tough battles.
In the 1962 Chile World Cup, Czechoslovakia and Mexico met in the group stage. That was one of the most memorable moments in Mexican football history — they defeated Czechoslovakia, the eventual runner-up of that tournament, 3-1, achieving their first World Cup victory in national team history. Even more astonishing, Czechoslovakia’s Václav Mašek scored just 15 seconds into the game, setting a record for the fastest goal in World Cup history for 40 years, but Mexico completed the comeback.
Fourteen years later, the two teams met again on the World Cup stage, with Mexico as the host and Czechoslovakia now an independent republic. The ghosts of history linger under the night sky of Aztec — Mexico hopes to relive the glory of 1962, while Czech aims to erase that defeat.
Calling Mexico the "ancestor of competitive football" might be an exaggeration, but it’s not unfounded —
In Chichen Itza’s Mayan ruins, there is a giant stadium 166 meters long and 68 meters wide, the largest in ancient Central America. The Maya’s ball game was originally for worship — the Aztecs played a sport called "Tlachtli," passing the ball with knees, elbows, and hips, simulating the battle between the sun and the stars and the moon. Sometimes, losing meant losing your life.
From sacrificial battles to the "Mexican Wave" of 100,000 people in the Aztec Stadium — football in Mexico is not just an ordinary sport. In the 1986 World Cup, Mexican fans spontaneously cheered for their team by alternating standing up, creating waves that looked like rolling ocean waves from afar. Since then, "La Ola" has swept the world.
Mexico’s advantage lies in composure, but the hidden danger is rotation. The host, already locked in first place, has no reason not to rotate the lineup — especially veterans like Gutiérrez and Jiménez. The 17-year-old genius Silveto Mora is expected to make his World Cup debut, a reward for the young player but also possibly lacking the seasoned finishing ability on the attack.
Czech’s disadvantage is passivity, but their opportunity lies in a do-or-die fight. They must win to keep their knockout hopes alive, and their fighting spirit in such desperation should not be underestimated. The problem for Czech is a lack of midfield control — both matches had possession rates below 39% — and facing a Mexican second team that might rotate heavily, this gap could narrow.
Mexico’s defensive core, Basque and Montes, will face the challenge of Hík’s impact. Czech’s top scorer, Hík, has already scored 4 goals for the national team this season, and his role as a pivot and finisher is their sharpest weapon. On the Mexican side, midfielder Edson Alvarez is playing injured, and his condition is uncertain.
Score prediction: Czech 2:1 Mexico.
This score would be the most thrilling victory for Czech football since their return to the World Cup stage in 2006. It would also be another classic moment to be remembered in the long history of Aztec Stadium.
Mexicans can look forward to the knockout stage, while Czechs are still fighting for breath. The most fascinating part of football is this — when a person has nowhere to retreat, they often run at their fastest. The charge of the Eastern European cavalry will carve out the most dazzling arc under the shadow of the Aztec giant.

#TradFiCFD黄金大师赛 The TradFi CFD Gold Master Competition is a current trading contest activity on Gate, focusing on TradFi-style trading competitions. The core gameplay involves trading gold, silver, crude oil, forex, US stocks, indices, and other popular traditional financial assets worldwide through CFD contracts, climbing the leaderboard to win big prizes, with hourly draws for gold.
Event duration: June 11, 2026, 18:00 — July 11, 2026, 18:00 (UTC+8), currently ongoing.
Core reward mechanism:
Double leaderboard battle: Trading leaderboard + Return rate leaderboard, with a total prize pool that can unlock up to 500,000 USDT
Gold Lucky Bag: Fixed distribution of 1,020 grams of gold as a reward
Hourly Gold Draw: 1 gram of gold drawn every hour in the regular session; VIP5+ exclusive session draws 5 grams of gold daily
Newcomer First Trade Benefit: New users can also receive a 200 USDx CFD position experience voucher
Participation method: Register and participate in TradFi CFD trading, complete trading tasks, referral tasks, or VIP tasks to unlock the lottery qualification.
How to trade CFDs: Open the Gate App → Bottom navigation "TradFi" → "CFD Contracts" → Open an account and transfer funds → Select trading pair (e.g., Gold XAUUSD) → Choose direction (Long/Short) → Enter quantity and place order.

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U 2026 World Cup Championship Predictions: Who Looks Most Likely to Win?
The 2026 USA-Canada-Mexico World Cup is underway. This is the first time in history that the tournament has expanded to 48 teams, with 12 groups and 104 matches, destined to be the craziest edition ever. The first round of the group stage has just concluded, with 24 matches smashing 75 goals, an average of 3.12 goals per game, setting a new first-round scoring record in nearly 68 years.
Some are happy, some are worried: who looks most likely to win? Who are just paper tigers? Today, we analyze data from major organizations, team form, and match schedules to give you the most hardcore prediction for the championship.
🥇 Tier One: The Top Contenders
🇦🇷 Argentina Winning Probability 16-18%
FIFA Rank: 1st in the world
Key Players: Messi, Alvarez, Enzo
First Match Performance: 3-0 against Colombia
✅ Advantages: Defending champions + Copa America winners, with strong team cohesion and mature tactical systems. North American climate is closer to South America, making adaptation easier. After advancing from the group, they won’t face other group winners before the quarterfinals, making the route relatively smooth.
Hidden Risks: Aging squad, with 39-year-old Messi’s ability to sustain throughout the tournament being the biggest concern.
🇫🇷 France Winning Probability 13-18%
FIFA Rank: 3rd in the world
Key Players: Mbappé, Griezmann, Chouaméni
First Match Performance: 3-1 against Senegal
✅ Advantages: One title and one runner-up in the last two World Cups, top-tier tournament experience. Deep squad depth, arguably the best in the world, with Mbappé leading an unstoppable frontline.
Hidden Risks: Internal stability sometimes fluctuates, defensive vulnerabilities exposed in the first match.
🇪🇸 Spain Winning Probability 12-16%
FIFA Rank: 2nd in the world
Key Players: Yamal, Pedri, Rodri
First Match Performance: 0-0 against Cape Verde (upset)
Advantages: Newly crowned European Championship champions, with a young and talented squad. Mature possession-based system, top midfield control. After a 4-0 victory over Saudi Arabia in the second round, they regained form.
Hidden Risks: Drawn first match with Cape Verde exposed weaknesses against dense defenses. May struggle again in knockout rounds against defensive teams.
🇧🇷 Brazil Winning Probability 11-20%
FIFA Rank: 5th in the world
Key Players: Vinícius, Rodyrgo, Neymar
First Match Performance: 1-1 against Morocco (draw)
Advantages: Talent is never in short supply; the new generation including Vinícius and Rodyrgo has taken on major roles. Strong attacking firepower, with a shot conversion rate of 19%.
Hidden Risks: Failed to secure a win in the first match, defensive stability needs improvement. Must quickly find a new tactical core.
🥈 Tier Two: Strong Contenders
🏴 England Winning Probability 10-13%
Key Players: Kane, Bellingham, Saka
Young talents are bursting onto the scene, with Bellingham, Saka, and Foden forming the new "Golden Generation." Luxurious front and midfield lineups, with long-standing high market value. But mental toughness in big tournaments has always been questioned; overcoming psychological barriers is key.
🇵🇹 Portugal Winning Probability 5-8%
Key Players: B.F., B.S., Leão, Ronaldo
The squad has undergone a new generation transition, with B.F., B.S., and Leão all in their prime. No obvious weaknesses across three lines, making them a recognized contender. Ronaldo’s experience remains a valuable asset.
🇩🇪 Germany Winning Probability 7-8%
Key Players: Musiala, Wirtz, Neuer
In a rebuilding phase, but with rich tournament experience and solid defense. Beat Ivory Coast 2-1 in the first match, with Ondaof scoring a double as a substitute to show resilience. 🐴 Dark Horse Potential
🇲🇦 Morocco The biggest dark horse, reached the semifinals in the last World Cup, one of Africa’s strongest teams. Drew 1-1 with Brazil in the first match, proving their strength is no fluke. Capable of another deep run.
🇯🇵 Japan The Asian Light, with a 4-0 victory over Tunisia in the first match, Ueda scoring twice, in hot form. The ceiling of Asian football, fully capable of challenging the top eight.
🇳🇱 Netherlands The uncrowned king, with a young and explosive squad. Never underestimate the knockout potential of the Orange Army.
Key conclusion: Spain, Argentina, and France are the top three vying for the title, with Brazil and England lurking closely. The combined winning probabilities exceed 50%, and the champion will likely come from these five teams.
This World Cup has expanded to 48 teams for the first time, with a complete change in format:
• 12 groups of 4 teams each, with the top two from each group + the 8 best third-placed teams advancing to the Round of 32
• More matches = more variables, greater physical toll, more rotation needed
• Weaker teams have more opportunities to "park the bus," as exemplified by Cape Verde’s draw with Spain in the first match
• Third-placed teams can also qualify, leading to more "group of death" matchups in knockout stages
🏆 Based on a comprehensive analysis of team strength, schedule, historical background, and current form, my judgment is:
🥇 Most likely champion: Argentina With the defending champion’s experience + Messi’s final dance + a relatively smooth route to the final, with favorable timing, location, and team synergy.
🥈 Biggest threat: France As long as Mbappé stays healthy, France is a nightmare for any opponent. Their squad depth can handle the long tournament. 🥉 The wild card: Spain Mastery of possession, but their weakness is breaking down dense defenses. Their fate in knockout rounds depends on who they face.
One sentence summary: Argentina’s legacy, France’s talent, Spain’s system — one of these three will likely win. The champion will probably come from these three teams. Brazil and England are the biggest variables.

#以太坊基金会重组降本 The Foundation steps back, Ethlabs moves forward: Ethereum ushers in the biggest overhaul in history
 June 23rd, the recently questioned Ethereum ecosystem received two major news. First, several former Ethereum Foundation researchers established an independent non-profit organization, Ethlabs, and received significant funding support from major ETH holders like Bitmine, SharpLink, and others.
According to its introduction, Ethlabs’ early work will focus on key needs for large-scale institutional on-chain adoption, including faster settlement speeds, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions based on robust infrastructure, mainnet capacity expansion, and foundational research supporting ETH’s monetary properties. Soon after, the Ethereum Foundation announced the end of a months-long restructuring, laying off 54 people, about 20% of its previous staff.
This adjustment continues the “streamlining Ethereum” strategic transformation, repositioning the Ethereum Foundation as a lighter protocol governance and maintenance entity rather than a primary core builder.
In this push and pull, Ethereum is sending a clear signal: the foundation is actively ceding its position, with ecosystem organizations taking on more execution functions. Ethereum is no longer trying to be driven by a centralized non-profit to determine its route, build, promote, and adopt. This may be the most significant governance correction in over a decade. Over the past year, external criticism of Ethereum has shifted from ETH price performance to organizational efficiency, strategic expression, and ecosystem mobilization. Ethereum once appeared overly “correct,” too slow, and overly dependent on the Foundation and Vitalik’s implicit endorsement. Today’s two changes are precisely responses to these criticisms: Ethereum isn’t without direction, but is trying to change how it produces direction.
One, Ethlabs gains ecosystem support, but Vitalik is absent
The establishment of Ethlabs first signifies that the Ethereum ecosystem is developing a new organization closer to an “industrial execution layer.” Unlike traditional research institutions, Ethlabs’ goal isn’t just to propose new cryptographic directions or long-term roadmaps, but to more clearly address practical issues like institutional on-chain adoption, financial asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, mainnet capacity, and ETH’s monetary properties. Behind these issues lies Ethereum’s core anxiety over the past few years: it remains the most important smart contract network, but in real institutional adoption, on-chain finance scale, and user experience, its advantages are not as solid as market imagines. Ethereum isn’t lacking research or ideas; what it lacks is an intermediary layer to turn research into market adoption. That’s the significance of Ethlabs. On Ethlabs’ official website, many influential figures in the Ethereum ecosystem are listed as supporters, including key individuals from the Ethereum Foundation, investors from Dragonfly, Electric Capital, and others, contributors from Base, Flashbots, Uniswap, and more. Notably, Vitalik is not on this supporter list. This doesn’t necessarily mean disagreement with Ethlabs; rather, it’s more reasonable to interpret that he is intentionally avoiding giving this new organization too strong a personal endorsement or path interference. Over the years, Vitalik has been a symbol of Ethereum, proposing ideas like soul-bound tokens, DeSoc, privacy, account abstraction, and public goods funding—many forward-looking, but few have seen large-scale market adoption. The issue isn’t that these directions lack value, but that when Vitalik’s every expression is seen as “Ethereum’s next narrative,” the entire ecosystem risks falling into implicit dependence, leading to over-investment of time and resources.
This year, Vitalik has published only 2 articles on his official blog, compared to at least 15 per year previously. This change itself is intriguing. It doesn’t mean Vitalik’s influence on Ethereum is waning; rather, it’s a form of active restraint: shifting Ethereum from a “founder-driven public narrative” to a “multi-organization, multi-team, multi-stakeholder collaborative technical network.” If Ethlabs is to undertake stronger institutionalization, financialization, and execution functions, it cannot just be an extension of Vitalik’s will. It must prove it can earn ecosystem trust without the founder’s direct endorsement and respond to the market through tangible results.
Two, the new structure and positioning of the Ethereum Foundation
While Ethlabs moves forward, the Ethereum Foundation steps back. For a long time, although nominally just a non-profit supporting Ethereum, it has played multiple roles: strategic coordinator, research funder, protocol roadmap setter, and cultural hub. It neither wants to be a traditional corporate headquarters nor has it avoided functions similar to a headquarters on key issues. This structure once helped Ethereum maintain neutrality and decentralization but also caused side effects: slow decision-making, vague expression, unclear responsibility boundaries. The outside world both hopes for clearer strategies from the Foundation and criticizes its strong voice. Internally, disagreements have also been reported. The Guardian previously reported internal disputes over strategic direction, leadership adjustments, and institutional adoption, with tensions between “cypherpunk” and “pragmatic business” camps; in March 2025, the Foundation appointed Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Stańczak as co-CEOs, seen as a compromise between these cultures. But clearly, after their departures, the 2025 team restructuring failed, with core figures like Josh Stark, Trenton Van Epps, Dankrad Feist leaving, coupled with persistent low prices and growing criticism. The Foundation had to reorganize again.
Post-restructuring, the Foundation will split into clusters such as protocol layer, access layer, user layer, community layer, and institutional layer, and cut 54 staff, about 20% of its previous size. This isn’t just cost-cutting but boundary shrinking: the Foundation is repositioning itself as a lighter protocol governance and maintenance entity, not the main builder of all ecosystem directions. In fact, besides Ethlabs, several other non-profits have emerged in the past year, like Ethereum Applications Guild, The Ethereum Economic Zone, Argot Collective, contributing from application promotion, Rollup collaboration, to Solidity maintenance. “The privilege of managing Ethereum should not be monopolized but shared cautiously with those committed to building sovereign infrastructure, whether old friends or newcomers,” the Foundation clearly states in its latest post.
Three, turning “correctness” into “effectiveness”
Ethereum’s past advantages came from its developer community, DeFi liquidity, L2 ecosystem, and protocol security. But over the last two years, these advantages haven’t fully translated into ETH’s market performance. Community criticism of the Foundation is essentially “shareholder anxiety.” Paul Brody, chair of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, once commented that the Ethereum community behaves somewhat like ordinary shareholders, “they want returns.” Though harsh, it’s truthful. A month ago, Ryan Sean Adams, co-founder of Bankless, tweeted, “Ethereum’s future can no longer rely on the Ethereum Foundation (EF). EF is important, but Ethereum needs new institutions to fill the gap. We need an organization that genuinely wants ETH to succeed—growth in quantity—and dares to speak out and execute. EF is not that, and never will be.”
Today, Ethlabs carries the expectations of major ETH holders like Bitmine, SharpLink, and a large coin-holding community. These two companies hold over 6 million ETH combined, and their demands for Ethereum are not just about the technical roadmap but whether ETH can bring substantial returns to their shareholders. This is inherently different from the Foundation’s role. EF must maintain trustworthiness and neutrality, not directly serve ETH’s price like a listed company, nor simplify protocol governance to maximize holder interests. But organizations like Ethlabs can take on clearer market-oriented functions.
In other words, the Foundation is responsible for keeping Ethereum “correct,” while Ethlabs needs to prove Ethereum remains “effective.” Ethereum could respond to market doubts with “long-termism” in the past, but when Hyperliquid takes over derivatives narratives, Solana captures meme narratives, and Bitcoin seizes asset narratives, Ethereum must prove it’s not only the safest smart contract platform but also the most capable network for the next wave of on-chain financial expansion. Of course, this shift isn’t without risks. With Ethlabs supported by large ETH holders and institutional forces, new concerns may arise about “Ethereum centralizing from the Foundation to large holders.” Adoption by institutions might also conflict with Ethereum’s original cypherpunk spirit. But for today’s Ethereum, the bigger risk isn’t moving too fast but remaining stuck between technical correctness and organizational sluggishness.
Markets ultimately reward not just ideas or decentralization stances but networks that can maintain trustworthiness while continuously attracting capital, applications, developers, and institutions. The establishment of Ethlabs and the Foundation’s restructuring are key steps toward this direction.

#欧洲议会为数字欧元开绿灯 European Parliament Approves Digital Euro Plan, Aiming to "De-Americanize" Payment Systems
June 23rd, the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs officially approved the long-debated Digital Euro plan. This move aims to reduce the EU's reliance on the U.S.-dominated payment system and strengthen "financial sovereignty." As a central bank digital currency (CBDC) issued and backed by the European Central Bank, the Digital Euro will support online and offline payments, with an emphasis on privacy protection. The EU plans to reach a final agreement with member states by the end of the year.
Core Logic Overview
Strategic autonomy driven, breaking free from U.S. payment system dependence: According to data from the European Central Bank, the two major U.S. payment giants Visa and MasterCard account for 61% of card payment transactions in the Eurozone, nearly monopolizing all cross-border card payment business. As geopolitical tensions escalate, concerns within the EU about reliance on foreign payment infrastructure are growing. The Digital Euro is one of the key initiatives proposed by the EU to enhance strategic autonomy, intended to supplement rather than replace cash and existing banking services.
Emphasizing privacy protection, building a new payment ecosystem: According to the proposal, consumers will be able to hold Digital Euros through dedicated digital wallets, though specific holding limits have not yet been determined. The system will support online and offline payments and emphasize high privacy protection, with the European Central Bank unable to directly identify users through payment data. The ECB will provide the underlying infrastructure, while commercial banks and payment service providers will offer related Digital Euro services to customers.
Legislative process accelerates, final agreement expected within the year: The European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs has reached a consensus on the single currency plan. It is expected that the European Parliament will formally confirm the committee's position at a plenary session in Strasbourg in early July. Subsequently, the EU will engage in formal negotiations with the 27 member states. Legislators hope to reach a final agreement by the end of this year.
Global CBDC race accelerates, divergence between U.S., China, and Europe: The EU is not the only economy advancing public digital currencies. 🇨🇳 has already launched the Digital Renminbi, and Russia has announced that the Digital Ruble will be officially operational by September 2026. In contrast, the U.S. has taken a different approach, supporting the development of stablecoins, believing this technology could further strengthen the dollar's international position.
Legislative process risks falling short of expectations: The Digital Euro still needs to undergo formal negotiations with all 27 member states. If there are significant disagreements on key issues such as compensation mechanisms, the final agreement could be delayed.
Technical security and privacy risks: CBDCs involve massive amounts of user data and funds. Major technical vulnerabilities or privacy breaches could trigger a public trust crisis.
Commercial bank resistance risks: The Digital Euro may exert a squeezing effect on commercial bank deposits. If the design of the compensation mechanisms is unreasonable, banks may be less willing to participate actively.
Geopolitical game risks: The promotion of the Digital Euro could trigger countermeasures from the U.S. and other countries, potentially intensifying global payment system conflicts and affecting the internationalization of the Digital Euro.

#芝加哥期权交易所推预测平台 The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) launched the prediction market suite "Cboe Predicts" on June 23, 2026 (initially offering binary options contracts based on the Mini S&P 500 Index), and combined with traditional exchanges like CME, ICE, and Nasdaq's accelerated deployment of prediction markets (event trading), the impact on the crypto market is reflected in the following four dimensions:
1. Introducing incremental capital, enhancing market liquidity
The entry of traditional exchanges brings substantial traditional financial funds and institutional investors into the crypto market. Prediction markets (event trading) have relatively low barriers to entry (such as simple binary options structures and capped risks), which can attract retail capital and investors seeking alternative speculative channels, injecting additional liquidity into the crypto market and potentially increasing activity of related crypto assets (such as tokens associated with prediction markets).
2. Promoting compliance and regulatory integration, reducing market risks
The involvement of traditional exchanges is usually accompanied by strict compliance frameworks (regulated by CFTC or SEC) and mature clearing systems. This helps provide a "compliance model" for the crypto market, pushing event trading toward standardization and transparency, reducing uncertainties caused by regulatory gray areas, and enhancing the overall risk resilience of the market.
3. Facilitating the integration of traditional finance and crypto finance, enriching the trading ecosystem
Traditional exchanges collaborate (such as CBOE partnering with Interactive Brokers) or invest (such as ICE investing in Polymarket) to combine traditional financial infrastructure and market-making capabilities with the flexibility and innovation of crypto markets. This not only enriches the derivatives trading ecosystem in crypto but also promotes the integration of "on-chain prediction markets" with "traditional financial prediction markets," providing more comprehensive risk management and price discovery tools.
4. Intensifying market competition, accelerating industry reshuffling and iteration
The entry of traditional financial giants intensifies competition in the prediction market space, creating a "dimensionality reduction" or "co-opetition" relationship with existing decentralized prediction platforms (like Polymarket) and crypto derivatives platforms. This forces the crypto industry to accelerate iteration in user experience, product innovation (such as more diverse prediction scenarios), and underlying technology (such as compliance and smart contract integration), driving the industry toward a more mature and professional direction.
Prediction markets (event trading) still belong to high-risk financial derivatives. While the involvement of traditional institutions brings compliance and liquidity benefits, investors should remain vigilant about market volatility, regulatory policy changes, and the complexities of the products.

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U Croatia vs Panama World Cup Prediction
The decisive battle for the Grid Army! Croatia faces Panama, and if they don’t score points, they’re out!
At 7 a.m. Beijing time on June 24, the second round of Group L at the 2026 USA-Canada-Mexico World Cup will feature a true life-or-death match, with Panama and Croatia, both defeated in the first round, facing off—whoever loses again will basically pack their bags early, and only a win can keep the last hope of qualifying alive!
Grid Army
As a veteran team that has won second and third place in the World Cup, Croatia’s debut was a 4-0 drubbing by England, exposing their defensive weaknesses completely. 40-year-old team soul Modrić inexplicably gave away a penalty, marking the curtain call of the golden generation, and they started off with a big stumble.
The entire team’s total value is 387 million euros, and a player like Gvardiol, worth 70 million euros, can match an entire opposing team. If they can’t even take down Panama, then Mislav’s last dance at the World Cup will have to end early.
Panama
A typical “civilian side” configuration in the group, with a total team value of only 34.93 million euros. Several players in Croatia are valued over 40 million euros. In the first round, they held Ghana to almost a clean sheet for 90 minutes but were cruelly snatched victory in stoppage time, losing in the most frustrating way.
Although North and Central American teams don’t have many big-name stars, their strategy of five defenders sitting deep to defend, tough physical play, and counterattacks on the flanks is effective against veteran teams that are older, slow-footed, and eager to score and boost goal difference.
Match Prediction
Although Croatia’s strength on paper is overwhelming, as long as they play steadily and win, it shouldn’t be a problem.
But they can’t afford to lose—not only do they need to win, but they also need to maximize goal difference to cover the gap from the first round. Most likely, they will go all out with aggressive offense, leaving gaps in the defense that Panama can exploit.
Croatia, who haven’t earned a point yet, can’t beat Panama, and in the last round, they face already three-point Ghana. The opponent isn’t stupid—playing for a draw can still get them through.
Croatia’s knockout stage via penalty shootout is possible, but they must first qualify for the knockout stage. The top eight third-placed teams need at least 4 points to advance. With Mislav leading this group of Peppa Pig, if they fail to get three points in this match, it might be the end of Modrić’s career…
Croatia, don’t think you’re safe just yet!

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U The 2026 World Cup in the US, Canada, and Mexico—one of these two teams is expected to lift the Holy Grail! After the first round of the group stage, all the teams have made their appearances, with their form varying.
As of now, the defending champion Argentina is still relying on the fading glory of the football king, while the other players are playing far too cautiously—retaining the title won’t be easy.
The new European Championship favorites, Spain, are overly dependent on passing and possession, but they’re also extremely inefficient, making it hard to turn plays into goals. The team lacks the person to deliver the final strike, and the recovery status of Nico and Yamal will determine Spain’s future.
Germany is still careless and lacking discipline. Winning 7-0 in a match against a team is not something they fear would bring bad luck—whether they can win the title comes down to whether they have the courage to drop Sané.
Brazil has completely fallen apart. They were actually blown apart in midfield by a kid from Morocco, and the whole match left them extremely passive. Ancelotti also seems to have no way to manage a team that relies too much on individual performances.
Portugal’s underlying problem lies with Cristiano Ronaldo—why does he have absolutely no self-awareness? It’s as if the whole team is just accompanying the leader in the game; without adjusting the starting lineup, success is unlikely.
France is full of star power, and its adjustment capability is also exceptionally strong. The whole team gives off a kind of composure—no rush, no panic—like they’ll take it sooner or later. The only shortcoming is that Ballon d’Or winner Dembélé still hasn’t gotten going.
Since Tuchel cut down a host of princes and clearly established Kane as the core, the entire England squad has been completely refreshed. Kane has delivered Ballon d’Or-level performances on both offense and defense, making them absolutely worth looking forward to.
Overall, I actually like France and England.

#Gate最新储备金证明 Gate Latest Reserve Fund Report: Overall reserve ratio reaches 115%, with sufficient core asset reserves
Gate releases the latest reserve fund report, as of June 22, 2026, the platform's overall reserve coverage ratio reaches 115%, above the industry safety benchmark of 100%, covering nearly 500 types of user assets, with a verifiable mechanism to ensure user asset safety. Regarding core assets, BTC user assets increased from 17,216 to 19,054 coins, with platform reserves of 25,292 coins, an over-reserve of 32.73%; ETH user assets are 344,935 coins, with platform reserves of 423,960 coins, an over-reserve of 22.91%. Among stablecoins, USDT user assets are 1.42B coins, reserves are 1.43B coins, an over-reserve of 1.00%; USDC user assets are 89 million coins, reserves are 117 million coins, an over-reserve of 30.75%; USD1 user assets increased from 6.82 million coins to 712 million coins, reserves are 782 million coins, an over-reserve of 9.87%; GUSD user assets increased from 108 million coins to 185 million coins, reserves are 319 million coins, an over-reserve of 72.81%. Additionally, GT and XRP reserve ratios are 134.18% and 116.92%, respectively, with stable core asset reserves, supporting user fund security and platform operational stability. $GT

#我的Gate交易时刻 Positive news everywhere but surged then plunged! Bitcoin and Ethereum deep market analysis on June 23: Bitcoin keeps bleeding, Ethereum’s rebound just an illusion?
On June 23, the crypto market experienced a typical pattern of good news being quickly priced in followed by a downturn: US-Iran negotiations made progress, Bitcoin spot ETF saw five weeks of continuous outflows, institutional accumulation persisted. Amid multiple bullish signals, Bitcoin once surged past $65,500, but after the spike, there was no support, combined with negative US stock news, the market quickly reversed and declined.
What’s more concerning is that Ethereum followed Bitcoin’s surge but fell even deeper, ETH/BTC exchange rate continued to decline, market funds flooded into Bitcoin, Ethereum was completely caught in a passive bleeding trend. Is this rebound and fall a short-term shakeout or the start of a new downtrend? As the massive options settlement approaches at the end of Q2, how should the next month and second half of the year be strategized? This article combines four dimensions—price action, macro news, institutional moves, and on-chain data—to comprehensively analyze the current market’s true bullish and bearish landscape.
1. Real-time market overview: All assets surged then retreated, bulls and bears in a tense tug-of-war
1. Bitcoin: Range-bound between 64,000-64,500, all gains erased by June 23, overall holding steady in a narrow 64,000-64,500 USD range. Early gains driven by US-Iran negotiations pushed briefly above 65,500 USD, hitting an intraday high. But after the positive news settled, bullish momentum quickly faded, compounded by negative US stock news, prices dropped sharply, retracing most of the gains, now at a critical support/resistance point. Due to exchange time zones and quoting mechanisms, major platforms show slight discrepancies, but overall, a slight upward trend persists.
2. Ethereum: Weak trend hard to reverse, long upper shadows indicate bulls are exhausted
Ethereum’s movement is entirely dependent on Bitcoin, but weaker overall, currently trading in the 1700-1760 USD weak zone. Last night, it surged with Bitcoin to a high of 1779 USD, then plunged sharply back to around 1724 USD, forming a long upper shadow on the daily chart, clearly signaling the end of this short-term bullish rebound.
2. Macro news analysis: Visible positives, why can’t the market rally?
Many traders are puzzled: spot ETF funds are flowing back, giants are accumulating, geopolitical risks are easing—triple bullish signals—so why can’t prices keep rising? The core reason is that short-term positive effects are being realized, but combined with sudden negative US stock news, the market is suppressed. The Fed’s hawkish stance keeps long-term pressure, creating an extreme hedge between bullish and bearish signals.
✅ The four major hard-core bullish factors supporting the market’s bottom:
- Geopolitical risk easing, inflation pressures alleviated, high-level US-Iran-Switzerland talks made substantial progress, with both sides agreeing to finalize a cooperation deal within 60 days. Iran’s oil re-enters the global supply, international oil prices hit a 16-week low. Falling oil prices directly ease global inflation, giving the Fed room to pause rate hikes, providing a breathing space for risk assets, and triggering Bitcoin’s short-term surge.
- Listed companies continue buying, rumors of major investors’ collapse are thoroughly dispelled. MicroStrategy (now Strategy) has increased holdings for three consecutive weeks, buying 520 BTC from June 15-21, costing $39.4 million. The CEO publicly clarified risks of preferred stock liquidation, dispelling panic rumors of major investors’ collapse. The company’s total Bitcoin holdings approach $57 billion, with long-term institutional confidence firm.
- Spot ETF reaches a key turning point, ending five weeks of continuous outflows. After the US stock market opened overnight, Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $128 million in a single day, with BlackRock’s IBIT fund restarting large-scale purchases, ending five weeks of continuous outflows. Historical data shows that in mid-June, the market also saw a single-day inflow of $85.8 million, indicating institutional bottom-fishing funds have quietly entered, though the volume is still insufficient to reverse the trend.
- Ethereum ecosystem receives major positive news: addressing R&D weaknesses. Ethlabs, a nonprofit founded by a core Ethereum researcher, received full support from Ethereum’s founders, top investors, and leading ecosystem companies. Amid ongoing leadership departures and governance disputes, Ethlabs will focus on tokenization of RWA, on-chain AI ecosystems, and stablecoin development, filling Ethereum’s R&D gaps. Meanwhile, top institution Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 52,203 ETH, approaching 5% of total supply, showing long-term confidence in Ethereum’s future value.
❌ The four major deadly bearish factors: the culprits suppressing two rebounds
- SpaceX’s $10 billion bond issuance shocks US stocks, risk assets under pressure. SpaceX announced plans to issue $20 billion in corporate bonds to fund AI infrastructure, causing its stock to plunge 16.4% in one day, while Nasdaq dropped 1.33%. As a high-risk asset, crypto is highly correlated with US stocks, which weakened along with the broader market, killing the bullish rebound.
- The Fed’s hawkish stance remains unchanged, the strong dollar cycle is ongoing. The Fed kept interest rates steady but continues hawkish signals, with expectations of rate hikes still present. The strong dollar continues to suppress all non-US risk assets. As long as the Fed doesn’t pivot to cut rates, a sustained bull market in crypto is unlikely.
- Bitcoin’s “bloodsucking” effect is at full throttle, Ethereum funds continue to flee. Current market risk sentiment heats up, funds flock to Bitcoin for safety, ETH/BTC drops to lows of 0.027. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s on-chain TVL has halved from $95 billion to $40 billion, DeFi funds are massively retreating, spot buying is scarce, and rebounds rely solely on leveraged contracts, making the market extremely fragile.
- Panic sentiment is at its peak, traders are very bearish. CoinMarketCap’s Fear & Greed Index is only 21, in extreme fear; Korea’s panic index is as low as 20. Market forecasts show only a 51.5% chance Bitcoin will hold above $64,000 today, and just 2.1% chance to stay above $68,000. Most traders are pessimistic about a short-term breakout.
3. Technical analysis
From a technical perspective, Bitcoin’s daily and 4-hour moving averages are all in a bearish alignment, with prices under the 60-day moving average, indicating a still-weak medium-term trend. However, daily RSI shows bullish divergence, and MACD’s selling pressure is waning, suggesting downside momentum has bottomed out. The likely scenario is sideways consolidation, with limited downside.
Focus on the June 26 options settlement, which involves hundreds of billions of dollars. Large derivative settlements could trigger short-term volatility, and market makers’ hedging needs may lead to a short squeeze.
Ethereum’s technicals are weaker than Bitcoin’s, with all cycle moving averages in a bearish alignment, and prices firmly below the 20-day moving average. Currently, the price is stuck near the middle Bollinger Band; a confirmed break below $1,700 could open the downside. To reverse the weakness, a volume-supported move above $1,800 is necessary.
4. Short-term + second-half outlook:
1-4 weeks: Range-bound consolidation, avoid chasing highs or selling lows
Bitcoin: Maintain between $60,000 and $67,000. Holding above $65,000 can target a rebound to $67,000; breaking below $63,000 suggests a pullback, with key support at $62,000-$60,000 for phased bottom-fishing. No major breakout or crash expected; consolidation is the main theme.
Ethereum: Weak oscillation between $1,700 and $1,800. Holding above $1,700 allows for short-term rebounds, but profits should be taken if it rises above $1,760. If volume breaks below $1,700, look for further decline toward $1,600. Remember: current rebounds are driven by leverage, not spot funds—avoid heavy long positions.
2026 Second-half market forecast
Bitcoin:
- Optimistic: Fed signals rate cuts in H2 + ETF funds continue inflow, potential rebound to $72,000-$78,000
- Pessimistic: Fed maintains tightening, market remains range-bound at $60,000-$70,000
Ethereum:
- Optimistic: Macro liquidity easing + ecosystem positive developments + ETF inflows push ETH above $2,000
- Pessimistic: Bitcoin’s bleeding continues, on-chain funds exit, ETH remains range-bound at $1,500-$1,700
All market analysis and price level judgments are based on publicly available historical data and technical surface analysis, solely for sharing market logic, not as investment advice for spot or derivatives trading.

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U Bold predictions for tomorrow's four World Cup matches: Spain, Uruguay, and Egypt will win, and Iran is expected to pull off an upset
The second round of the World Cup group stage has just reached the halfway point, and the watershed for qualification has already arrived.
In tomorrow’s four matches, each game is tied to the fate of at least two teams advancing.
After the first round, traditional powerhouses are collectively slow to warm up, while new teams are showing incredible resilience.
The phrase “clearly divided in strength” is becoming less and less applicable in this World Cup.
Spain versus Saudi Arabia is a redemption match for the title contenders.
After a 0-0 draw with Cape Verde in the first round, it’s one of the most eye-catching upsets so far.
With 74% possession, 27 shots, and 11 corners, the data shows absolute dominance, yet no goals resulted.
The old problems of possession-based football, circling without penetrating, and pressing without breaking through are once again exposed under the spotlight of the World Cup.
Del Bosque’s team isn’t incapable of creating chances; it’s the finishing efficiency inside the box and the ability to adapt against dense defenses that fall short, not matching the €1.27 billion squad value.
Spain has no room for retreat in this game.
It’s not that losing means elimination, but if they can’t beat Saudi Arabia, the prospects of this European Championship winner competing for the World Cup will become a joke.
The good news is that Yamal is highly likely to start, and this 18-year-old winger is precisely the variable needed to break down the bus.
Saudi’s defense isn’t bad in discipline, but their height and turning speed make it difficult to sustain against Spain’s continuous passing, cutting, and wing interplays for 90 minutes.
The suspense has never been whether Spain can win, but how many they can win by and whether they can display convincing dominance.
Uruguay versus Cape Verde is a battle to re-establish South America’s strength.
Uruguay’s situation isn’t much better than Spain’s.
They were held 1-1 by Saudi Arabia in the first round, with Nunez missing several good chances, and their lack of midfield creativity was magnified.
This team still relies on the old tactics—crossing from the wings and aerial assaults to create threats.
Against a bus formation, there aren’t many options.
But Cape Verde is not Saudi Arabia.
This new team managed to draw with Spain largely thanks to a phenomenal performance by their goalkeeper and a tactical approach of extreme defending.
Their attacking threat is almost negligible.
Uruguay’s physicality and set-piece advantages are precisely what Cape Verde struggles to handle.
As long as Uruguay can control the rhythm and avoid rushing recklessly, winning three points is highly probable.
The only variable is time.
The later the goal, the more intense the upset flames burn.
Egypt versus New Zealand is a battle for the African newcomers to earn points.
All four teams in Group G drew in the first round, so whoever gets their first win will hold the initiative to advance.
Egypt is the strongest on paper, with Salah’s presence serving as a baseline guarantee for the team.
In their first match against Belgium, Egypt led until the second half but was eventually equalized by an own goal, which was somewhat frustrating.
But it’s also clear that this Egypt team’s defensive resilience and counterattack efficiency have improved compared to previous tournaments.
New Zealand plays a straightforward style, relying on aerial balls and physical confrontations, but their technical gap is a major weakness.
Salah’s dribbling, passing, and finishing are unmatched in this group, and as long as the midfield provides enough support, beating New Zealand is straightforward.
Winning this game would put Egypt one foot into the knockout stage.
Iran versus Belgium is the most likely match for a major upset.
No one considers Iran a favorite, but no one dares to underestimate this Persian iron cavalry.
In the first round, Iran came from behind twice to draw with New Zealand, demonstrating strong resilience and tactical discipline.
Their 5-4-1 defensive formation is airtight, with double midfielders covering extensive ground, and Taremi’s pivot role and Jahanbakhsh’s wing attacks have lethal potential.
More importantly, Iran’s experience in big tournaments is top-tier among Asian teams.
Belgium’s problems are deeply ingrained.
After the golden generation’s decline, the team is in a transitional phase.
Doku’s absence has weakened their wing attack, Lukaku’s form is inconsistent, and midfield control is not what it used to be.
Their first-round draw with Egypt exposed issues of offensive ineffectiveness and sluggish rhythm.
Facing Iran’s all-out defense, Belgium might repeat Spain’s fate—dominating possession but failing to create clear chances, and being vulnerable to counterattacks.
Upsets are never just about luck.
When a team’s tactics are highly targeted, fighting spirit is at its peak, and the opponent is in poor form or riddled with internal doubts, the ground for an upset is prepared.
Iran may not win outright, but they definitely have the ability to do so.
Looking at these four matches together reveals the harsh truth of this World Cup.
The advantage of traditional powerhouses is rapidly diminishing.
It’s not that their strength is declining; it’s that weaker teams’ tactical literacy, physical condition, and execution are catching up.
Parking the bus is no longer a compromise for the weak but a carefully calculated optimal solution.
The gap in goalkeeping ability is narrowing, the maturity of defensive systems is leveling, and with VAR making refereeing fairer, the cost for underdogs to hold a draw or steal a win is decreasing.
On a deeper level, the homogenization of youth training is erasing the stylistic divide in football.
Spain’s possession-based passing is no longer exclusive, Germany’s high pressing is now learned worldwide, South American teams’ technical advantages are shrinking, and their physical disadvantages are becoming more apparent.
When all teams build their squads based on the same modern football template, top teams relying on talent to crush opponents will face increasing difficulty.
The World Cup expanding to 48 teams is not just about the tournament size but about the entire ecosystem.
In the past, group stage matches often had two or three “easy” games, but now every game is fought to the last minute.
The margin for error for strong teams is shrinking, and upsets will become more common.
It’s not that the World Cup level is declining; the football gap is truly narrowing.
After this round, the qualification picture in two groups will be roughly set.
If Spain and Uruguay both win in Group H, they will be tied at 4 points, and their final match will be a direct showdown for the top spot.
Saudi Arabia and Cape Verde will then face a do-or-die battle, with the winner having a chance to advance as the best third-placed team, while the loser will likely be eliminated early.
Group G’s situation will be even more chaotic.
If Egypt wins and Iran pulls off an upset for three points, Egypt will lead with 4 points, with Iran close behind.
Belgium and New Zealand will be pushed to the brink.
In the final round, Belgium will face Egypt, and Iran will play New Zealand, with a potential for a dramatic points reversal at any moment.
In the coming week, the group stage will enter its final phase, with more life-and-death battles and plot twists to follow.
The form of key players like Salah, Yamal, and Nunez will not only determine how far their teams go but also become some of the most watched topics of this World Cup.
The upsets in the first round were surprises; the results of the second round are the answers.
As for whether there will be new surprises tomorrow, no one can guarantee.
Because in the World Cup, the moment you think you’re safe is often when the variables begin.

#Gate股票7x24小时交易 Gate Stocks support 24/7 trading, covering the U.S. stock market, Hong Kong stock market, and Korean stock market
Official announcement, Gate Stocks continuously expand global stock trading scenarios. Building on the original pre-market, in-market, and after-hours trading, overnight and weekend trading support has now been added, further expanding trading hours coverage, supporting 24/7 trading of U.S., Hong Kong, and Korean stocks. The initial phase opens a total of 215 trading targets, including 195 popular U.S. stocks such as Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, Microsoft, 17 Hong Kong stocks like Tencent Holdings, Xiaomi Group, Meituan, and 3 Korean stocks including Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, Hyundai Motor, further breaking the traditional securities market trading time restrictions and improving users' global asset allocation efficiency.
No matter when or where, seize every market opportunity around the clock.
No longer limited by exchange opening hours, open anytime, strategize anytime.
👉https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/100269