
The crypto market cycle refers to a phenomenon where market prices and investor sentiment show cyclical changes over time. It is typically divided into five stages: accumulation → upward movement → peak → decline → consolidation. This pattern is repeated across multiple cycles and is considered by many traders as an important tool for understanding price behavior.
The formation of cycles is primarily driven by three factors: supply and demand relationships (such as halving events), market sentiment (changes in risk preference), and the macro environment (liquidity, interest rates, etc.).
Since the birth of Bitcoin, historical data shows that the market has experienced multiple significant cycles. For example, the cycles from 2013 to 2014, from 2017 to 2018, and from 2021 to 2022 all exhibited peaks and deep adjustments. During each cycle, the price of Bitcoin often experiences a sharp rise followed by a severe correction, eventually entering a long-term sideways adjustment phase.
After experiencing an increase in early 2025, Bitcoin did not maintain a strong rise throughout the year alongside mainstream assets, but instead showed a significant retracement trend at the end of the year and in early 2026. As of early 2026, the price of Bitcoin continued to decline and was affected by changes in expectations regarding macro policies.
Market sentiment has shifted from exuberance to caution, with some analysts suggesting that the current trend resembles a structural adjustment period rather than a traditional cycle peak or end.
Recently, market analysts have been hotly debating whether the cycle has failed. Some believe that as the degree of institutionalization increases and trading behaviors align more closely with traditional financial markets, the classic four-year cycle is less likely to appear as stably as it did in the past.
However, another viewpoint points out that cycles as a description of price phase changes still hold significance, but the driving parameters have changed - they are no longer solely dominated by halving events, but are more influenced by global liquidity and macro decisions.
The future cycles may integrate more factors, such as ETF capital flows, regulatory processes, macro liquidity, etc., making them more complex and multidimensional compared to traditional single time cycles. Cyclical trends still exist, but they may not be as straightforward as in the past.











