
Decentralized Science, coincidentally pronounced as "sigh" in English, represents a groundbreaking scientific and technological movement positioned at the intersection of science and Web3. Its primary objective is to establish public infrastructure dedicated to scientific research, fundamentally transforming how research is conducted, funded, and shared.
Decentralized Science (DeSci) introduces a novel and decentralized approach to research funding, breaking away from traditional centralized models. This innovative framework promotes collaboration among diverse stakeholders within the scientific research ecosystem, creating opportunities for unprecedented cooperation across disciplines and geographical boundaries.
Inspired by the Web3.0 ethos, DeSci aims to develop a decentralized scientific model that prioritizes three fundamental principles: transparency, accessibility, and most importantly, democratization. By leveraging these principles, DeSci seeks to remove barriers that have historically limited scientific progress and knowledge dissemination.
Furthermore, DeSci utilizes blockchain technology to construct public infrastructure for scientific research. This infrastructure incorporates Web3.0 tools, including smart contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), to create a more equitable and efficient research environment. These technological foundations enable researchers to collaborate seamlessly while maintaining data integrity and ensuring fair attribution of contributions.
Decentralized Science builds upon the foundation of the Open Science movement, which aims to make scientific research accessible to everyone. This movement emphasizes the open sharing of data, methodologies, protocols, software, and publications, thereby eliminating financial, legal, and technical barriers that have traditionally restricted access to scientific knowledge. The ultimate goal is to transform science into a universal methodology serving humanity and the planet.
While Open Science continues to gain momentum, its implementation faces numerous challenges. These obstacles include managing scientific resources effectively, validating data integrity, ensuring proper attribution, and maintaining transparency throughout the research process. These challenges have created gaps in the current scientific infrastructure that DeSci aims to address.
Organizations such as ArXiv, an electronic preprint platform, and SciHub, a research material platform, have attempted to address some of these issues. However, these platforms currently lack robust quality control and verification mechanisms, leaving room for improvement in ensuring the reliability and authenticity of shared research.
Decentralized Science offers several transformative potentials for the scientific community:
Crowdfunding for Scientific Research: DeSci platforms enable a broader range of investors and the general public to directly fund research projects. This model bypasses conventional funding barriers such as grant applications or institutional funding requirements. Consequently, a wider variety of research ideas can receive necessary financial support. This democratization of funding can lead to scientific innovation by supporting diverse research topics that might otherwise be overlooked by traditional funding sources.
Diversification of Funding Sources: Through crowdfunding mechanisms, projects that have historically struggled to secure funding through conventional channels can now find support. This approach enables broader scientific research and can lead to breakthrough achievements in non-mainstream fields. By opening funding channels to public participation, DeSci creates opportunities for innovative research that challenges established paradigms.
Collaborative Research: DeSci facilitates more extensive and effective collaboration among researchers worldwide. Using decentralized platforms, researchers can transparently and securely share data, methodologies, and results without intermediaries. This capability enhances research reproducibility, accelerates the pace of innovation, and promotes complex interdisciplinary projects on a global scale. The removal of geographical and institutional barriers enables scientists to form research teams based on expertise rather than proximity.
Open Access Publishing: Another crucial aspect of DeSci is ensuring open access to research through distributed ledger technology. This approach provides free access to scientific papers and data, overcoming the high costs and access restrictions of traditional publishing models. Additionally, it accelerates knowledge dissemination and promotes further research and development. By eliminating paywalls, DeSci ensures that scientific knowledge becomes a public good accessible to all.
When these elements converge, they have the potential to significantly accelerate scientific progress and create a more inclusive research environment.
Several key components distinguish DeSci from other decentralized fields. The most notable elements include the intersection of blockchain and Open Science, and the utilization of DAOs in scientific research.
Blockchain technology shares inherent characteristics with Open Science principles. The decentralized nature of blockchain means that no central authority controls information, and data remains immutable once recorded. This fundamental property creates a transparent and collaborative environment that supports citizen science and enables resource and data sharing among researchers.
Moreover, the public record of all transactions provided by blockchain enhances trust in research outcomes. This transparency allows for independent verification of scientific claims and reduces the possibility of data manipulation or fraudulent research practices.
Blockchain also utilizes cryptography and timestamping to create permanent records of all shared information. Scientists can leverage this capability to track research records and share data and content with confidence in their authenticity and provenance.
Additionally, blockchain's consensus mechanisms require approval from network members. This feature enables accurate calculation of metrics such as downloads per dataset or citation counts, and allows metadata verification without intermediaries. These capabilities create a more reliable and transparent system for measuring research impact and ensuring proper attribution.
DAOs were developed to enable people with common goals to collaborate without central authority. These organizations help align incentives among members because everyone has a stake in the outcomes. This alignment of interests creates a more equitable and motivated research community.
DAOs are governed by both organizational members and smart contracts, creating a transparent and democratic decision-making process. DeSci utilizes DAOs to democratize the scientific research process, giving voice to researchers, funders, and community members alike.
For example, developing new treatments or technologies in the biotechnology industry requires substantial research and development, often necessitating extensive collaboration. Traditionally, competition and intellectual property concerns can hinder this collaboration, with companies potentially withholding data to protect potential profits.
DAOs can encourage sharing by establishing immutable rules for contributions and rewards. This means researchers can freely collaborate with a clear understanding of predefined rules regarding how IP ownership will be distributed based on contributions. This transparency removes uncertainty and encourages open collaboration.
In summary, researchers can achieve faster results through DAOs than working individually at specific companies to treat the same diseases or benefit from scientific innovation. The collective intelligence and resources of a DAO can accelerate breakthroughs that might take years or decades under traditional research models.
DeSci projects leverage several common functionalities: smart contracts and communities, on-chain funding, and ownership mechanisms.
Smart contracts automate and enforce the interaction rules within DeSci ecosystems. They secure transactions and ensure compliance with predetermined protocols. These automated programs ensure that all processes are applied fairly to all participants, eliminating the need for trusted intermediaries and reducing the potential for bias or manipulation.
DeSci fosters communities centered around specific research interests. These communities share resources and collaborate seamlessly on projects. This approach enables communities to support research they find valuable and creates networks of engaged stakeholders who contribute expertise, funding, and oversight.
Research funding is raised and managed on the blockchain, reducing processing costs and burdens while increasing transparency. This model allows researchers to continue their work without the stress of facing threats to academic achievement or degree acquisition if their research results are not widely recognized. The transparent nature of on-chain funding also enables funders to track how their contributions are utilized.
Contributors maintain clear ownership of their intellectual property, which is recorded on the blockchain. This ensures that rights and rewards are appropriately distributed among all participants. The immutable record of contributions creates a transparent history of who contributed what to each research project.
One of the projects at the forefront of DeSci is Noblblock. This network operates not merely as a standard publishing platform but encourages collaboration and social engagement among users. Noblblock achieves its goals through the following features:
Noblblock operates as a blockchain-based scientific journal that decentralizes publishing and democratizes access to research results and academic journals. All data on the Noblblock blockchain is immutable and chronologically recorded, making tampering nearly impossible. This ledger proves when research results or inventions were made public, establishing clear priority and attribution.
The platform is user-friendly and facilitates collaboration among authors, reviewers, and editors. Authors can submit papers and monitor review progress, while editors can select qualified reviewers to assist in review decisions. This transparent process ensures accountability at every stage of publication.
The platform addresses the high publication costs in traditional scientific fields by eliminating article processing and subscription fees that restrict paper publication and research access. Authors only pay for the peer review services they use, and editors and reviewers earn tokens by paying small transaction fees. This model creates a sustainable ecosystem that fairly compensates all contributors.
Manuscript Submission: Authors submit manuscripts containing title, abstract, keywords, and other details including images and tables. Authors pay article processing fees and agree to deposit tokens in the editor pool.
Preliminary Evaluation: Editors receive notifications and preview the title and abstract before deciding whether to process the manuscript. If accepted, they review all details for scientific integrity and decide whether to reject or proceed to peer review.
Reviewer Recruitment: Editors use a system with filters and editable email templates to invite reviewers. Once this process is complete, reviewers gain access to the manuscript.
Peer Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's scientific quality and impact on the audience, providing feedback and recommendations. Editors then decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions from authors.
Copy Editing: Approved manuscripts undergo copy editing and formatting to prepare them for publication. Authors make final deposits for these services.
Publication and Archiving: Manuscripts are published on the blockchain, timestamped, and archived, creating a permanent record accessible to the global research community.
The fundamental utility token of the Noblblock platform is NOBL. Users can purchase NOBL through decentralized exchanges. This token enables users to manage articles and provide rewards to editors and reviewers, among other functions.
Additionally, users can exchange NOBL in P2P blockchain transactions. To date, a total of 1 billion NOBL tokens have been issued. Approximately 86 million NOBLE were used at launch. Post-launch annual issuance is 100 million NOBL, ensuring sustainable growth of the ecosystem.
The largest distribution of NOBL occurred through public sales, followed by reserves, team allocation, marketing, giveaways, legal expenses, and community initiatives. The remaining amounts are allocated to grant programs, reviewers, editors, authors, advisors, partnerships, and collaborations, creating a comprehensive ecosystem that supports all stakeholders.
To understand the benefits DeSci offers to the scientific community, we must first understand the problems in the current scientific landscape. Patrick Joyce, co-founder of Research Hub, points out critical issues:
Over the past 20 years, scientists have focused more on frequently publishing papers and accumulating citations rather than creating verifiable new knowledge. As a result, the efficiency needed to produce new technologies has decreased.
Furthermore, this scientific culture has caused several problems for scientific integrity. The scientific and academic communities face another issue called the replication crisis.
The replication crisis refers to problems in scientific research that make it difficult to reproduce research results. This can lead to concerns about whether previous research findings are valid. This crisis has undermined confidence in scientific findings and highlighted the need for more transparent and reproducible research practices.
One of DeSci's benefits is promoting transparency and accessibility in scientific research. All knowledge exchanges on the blockchain are transparently recorded. The public and scientific community can verify scientific outputs through accessible and verifiable platforms.
This approach leads to increased trust and improved scientific inclusivity. When research methodologies and inputs become transparent, the public and scientific community gain greater confidence in outputs, addressing replication issues. The ability to independently verify research claims strengthens the overall integrity of the scientific enterprise.
Specifically, transparent research methodologies enable scientists or the public to reproduce scientific experiments, facilitating validation and building upon existing work. This reproducibility is fundamental to the scientific method and has been compromised in recent years.
DeSci can also introduce innovative approaches to funding and collaboration within the scientific community by leveraging DAOs and smart contracts. This includes new funding models such as tokenized grants or crowdfunding for research projects, providing financial support to researchers. These alternative funding mechanisms can support research that traditional funding sources might overlook.
The decentralized nature of blockchain provides new collaborative opportunities, breaking down traditional barriers across disciplines and regions and accelerating scientific innovation and discovery. In this way, researchers receive community funding rather than corporate funding, reducing the need to publish or discard papers based on commercial considerations. This freedom allows scientists to pursue research based on scientific merit rather than market potential.
DeSci introduces new ways to evaluate and reward scientific efforts, creating a research environment for collaboration rather than competition. This shift in incentives can lead to more open sharing of data and methods, ultimately accelerating scientific progress.
In recent years, DeSci has been growing but has not yet dominated the scientific community. Here are some insights into the industry's current challenges:
Scientists other than computer scientists are generally not familiar with cryptocurrency. They may struggle to understand the complexities of wallets, security, chain abstraction, smart contracts, and other distributed ledger technologies. For DeSci adoption to expand, scientists' participation must increase. Building this groundbreaking field requires more scientists who are comfortable with blockchain technology.
Another issue facing this field is governance problems with DAOs and blockchain consensus. The goal is to provide accessibility to decision-making for everyone, even if some people are not qualified for specific roles. This means DeSci may face issues where unqualified participants vote in favor of low-value research due to ignorance, political alliances, or financial incentives. Developing robust governance mechanisms that balance inclusivity with expertise remains a significant challenge.
Today, one of many issues DAOs have not yet resolved is intellectual property management. Scientific research is often conducted through collaboration with institutions or corporations. Researchers often do not have complete property rights to research results or may transfer ownership as a condition of funding or employment.
To fully realize DeSci's potential, innovators must establish methods to manage the legal ramifications of predictable issues that may arise among involved parties, including researchers, institutions, corporations, or public funders. Creating legal frameworks that protect individual contributions while enabling collaborative research remains an ongoing challenge.
Decentralized Science represents a paradigm shift from traditional scientific practices. While traditional science relies on centralized institutions, peer review by established journals, and hierarchical funding structures, DeSci distributes these functions across blockchain networks and community-governed platforms.
Traditional science often faces challenges with publication bias, where negative results remain unpublished, and access barriers due to expensive journal subscriptions. DeSci addresses these issues through open access publishing and transparent peer review processes recorded on blockchain.
The funding models also differ significantly. Traditional science depends heavily on government grants and institutional funding, which can be slow and bureaucratic. DeSci enables direct crowdfunding and community-driven resource allocation, potentially accelerating research timelines and supporting unconventional projects.
Throughout this article, we have primarily explored the elements DeSci needs to succeed from a scientific perspective. From a blockchain perspective, DeSci requires high security, low fees, economic viability, finality, and cryptographic security features.
Security can mean different things to different people. In this context, DeSci needs robust decentralized applications with economic security. This is a capability Ethereum already provides through its extensive validator network and proven track record.
The economic security provided by Ethereum gas fees and staker yields is sufficient to launch and stabilize chains for application security. Since October 2022, Ethereum has generated nearly $1 billion in revenue. This also helps counter attacks on chain stability, making it an attractive foundation for DeSci applications.
Ethereum's decentralization means no single entity controls the network. This reduces risks associated with central points of failure such as hacking or corruption. The distributed nature of Ethereum's validator network ensures resilience against various attack vectors.
Finally, once data is recorded on the Ethereum blockchain, it cannot be changed. This immutability is crucial for the integrity of applications running on the blockchain because it prevents tampering with transaction records and application states. For scientific research, this immutability ensures that published findings and data remain unchanged and verifiable indefinitely.
Decentralized Science is establishing itself as one of the next-generation cryptocurrency fields with tremendous growth potential. As mentioned earlier, projects like Noblblock are paving the way. The decentralization of science can benefit the entire industry through transparent research and fair compensation, ultimately leading to better research outcomes.
Looking ahead, we can expect several emerging trends in DeSci:
Integration with AI and Machine Learning: DeSci platforms may increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence to enhance peer review processes, identify research patterns, and accelerate data analysis.
Expansion of DAOs for Specialized Research: More specialized research DAOs will likely emerge, focusing on specific scientific disciplines or research challenges, creating focused communities of experts.
Enhanced Interoperability: As the DeSci ecosystem matures, we can expect improved interoperability between different platforms and blockchains, enabling seamless collaboration across various research networks.
Mainstream Adoption: As blockchain technology becomes more user-friendly and scientists become more familiar with Web3 tools, DeSci may see increased adoption by traditional research institutions seeking to modernize their operations.
Regulatory Framework Development: Governments and scientific institutions will likely develop clearer regulatory frameworks for DeSci, providing legal certainty for researchers and institutions participating in decentralized research networks.
The future of Decentralized Science holds immense promise for transforming how humanity conducts, funds, and shares scientific knowledge, potentially accelerating breakthroughs that benefit all of humanity.
DeSci leverages blockchain technology to democratize scientific research globally. Unlike traditional science, it removes geographic and institutional barriers, enabling worldwide collaboration and broader participation in research projects and funding.
Decentralized science leverages blockchain for transparent, open collaboration in research. Platforms like ResearchHub tokenize contributions, NFTs represent IP ownership, and DAOs like VitaDAO democratize funding. This eliminates traditional gatekeepers, accelerates peer review, and enables direct researcher-to-investor connections.
DeSci projects use token rewards to incentivize researchers through DAO mechanisms. Contributors earn tokens based on research contributions, data sharing, and peer validation, driving scientific innovation and participation in decentralized research ecosystems.
Participants need research capability and technical knowledge. Individual researchers can secure funding through blockchain-based DeSci platforms via community voting, competitive grants, and decentralized funding mechanisms that democratize the traditional research financing process.
DeSci enables patient data sharing in biomedicine and distributed computing in physics. Blockchain enhances data transparency and security. Decentralized platforms improve research efficiency and collaboration across scientific disciplines.
DeSci faces quality control and integrity risks from open participation. Ensure research quality through rigorous peer review, transparent data management, and decentralized community validation mechanisms to maintain academic standards.
Decentralized science and traditional institutions can coexist complementarily. DeSci offers flexible collaboration and resource sharing, while traditional institutions provide structured validation and funding support. Both can jointly develop through collaborative projects and hybrid models.
Key DeSci platforms include Molecule, a decentralized biotech research funding platform supporting scientists in securing funding. Human focuses on health data analysis applications. These platforms leverage blockchain technology to democratize scientific research funding, enabling direct collaboration between researchers and investors while reducing intermediaries and accelerating innovation in life sciences.











