
The original intention of SafeMoon was to establish a token mechanism that rewards long-term holders. Its unique transaction tax design once attracted a large number of investors, being seen as an attempt at an “innovative incentive mechanism.” However, over time, skepticism about this mechanism has gradually increased in the market, and the project’s development direction has also been continuously adjusted.
According to the latest market data, the price of SafeMoon is extremely sluggish, currently showing a range of about $0.0000028–$0.0000030 across major platforms, with little daily fluctuation. Compared to its historical highs, the decline can be described as a complete long-term downtrend.
This situation fully demonstrates the risk characteristics of SafeMoon as an investment target: even though it was once popular, its price has not been able to maintain upward momentum.
SafeMoon has experienced several significant events on a technical level. In 2023, a smart contract vulnerability led to approximately $9 million in liquidity being exploited by hackers, and the loss of some assets exacerbated the collapse of market confidence. Additionally, the high taxes incurred during the migration from V1 to V2 also caused substantial losses for many users.
These factors combined have led to a deterioration of market sentiment, causing prices to remain low for an extended period.
Legal risks are a core issue for SafeMoon. The founding team has been sued by the SEC and DOJ for fraud and other charges, and has been convicted in federal court. This has a profound impact on the token price, causing investors to lose confidence in the project.
Bankruptcy liquidation and legal disputes not only delay project development but also further hinder the exchange’s support for SFM, which is particularly evident in the long-term price trend.
Despite the crisis faced by the original SafeMoon team, the new team proposed to migrate SFM to Solana and implement DAO governance in an attempt to fix the project’s structure and governance mechanisms.
This strategy briefly boosted prices and community interest, but it is still in the preliminary stage and has not yet led to a long-term stable upward price trend.
From community feedback, many long-term holders have expressed disappointment and even a sense of abandonment towards SafeMoon, while some investors still hope that migration and restructuring will bring opportunities for resurgence. This reflects the divergent attitudes in the market towards SafeMoon: on one hand, there is regret over past losses, and on the other hand, there is anticipation for the possibility of rebirth.
The price performance of SafeMoon is not optimistic and has exposed problems on multiple levels. However, attempts at technical migration and governance reform may leave a glimmer of hope for the project’s future.
For investors, understanding the historical risks and future potential opportunities of a project is an important prerequisite for formulating investment strategies.











