On February 3rd, Elon Musk recently stated during a discussion on savings and wealth that as artificial intelligence rapidly develops, human society may enter an era of “全民高收入” (which translates to “全民高收入” or “a nation of high income for all”), and traditional wage systems could be reshaped. He believes that large-scale automation will cover most labor positions, leading to exponential increases in productivity and unprecedented material abundance. At that time, people might no longer need to save money long-term as they did in the past, and poverty issues could gradually disappear.
Musk’s remarks have sparked significant attention. Some see it as a typical expression of technological optimism, believing that an AI-driven economy has the potential to redistribute wealth; others point out that economic transformation in reality often comes with pain, and short-term risks may be amplified by instability and institutional friction. Debates over timelines, implementation paths, and incentive mechanisms have quickly spread within the tech and financial circles.
In the field of crypto assets, especially within the Bitcoin community, this statement has met with a cautious attitude. Bitcoin supporters emphasize scarcity and fixed supply, believing that relying on a “全民分配” (which means “distribution to all” or “universal distribution”) model carries risks of centralization and inflation. Compared to trust in institutions, they value individual sovereignty and verifiable monetary rules more. In their view, universal basic income often accompanies currency expansion, while Bitcoin is seen as a long-term hedge against uncertainty.
Additionally, the risks of automation replacing jobs as a priority and delayed income redistribution are frequently mentioned. Historical experience shows that there is often a time lag between policy promises and market changes, and savings and risk hedging remain important parts of personal finance. For this reason, many crypto investors still adhere to a “self-protection” logic.
Musk’s envisioned prosperity represents an aggressive and radical imagination of how technology could shape future society; meanwhile, the cautious stance of the Bitcoin community reflects long-term concerns about institutional stability and inflation risks. The collision of these two perspectives highlights the core disagreements in the AI era regarding wealth distribution, governance, and trust.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Elon Musk predicts the arrival of an era of "high income for all"? However, the Bitcoin community remains cautious
On February 3rd, Elon Musk recently stated during a discussion on savings and wealth that as artificial intelligence rapidly develops, human society may enter an era of “全民高收入” (which translates to “全民高收入” or “a nation of high income for all”), and traditional wage systems could be reshaped. He believes that large-scale automation will cover most labor positions, leading to exponential increases in productivity and unprecedented material abundance. At that time, people might no longer need to save money long-term as they did in the past, and poverty issues could gradually disappear.
Musk’s remarks have sparked significant attention. Some see it as a typical expression of technological optimism, believing that an AI-driven economy has the potential to redistribute wealth; others point out that economic transformation in reality often comes with pain, and short-term risks may be amplified by instability and institutional friction. Debates over timelines, implementation paths, and incentive mechanisms have quickly spread within the tech and financial circles.
In the field of crypto assets, especially within the Bitcoin community, this statement has met with a cautious attitude. Bitcoin supporters emphasize scarcity and fixed supply, believing that relying on a “全民分配” (which means “distribution to all” or “universal distribution”) model carries risks of centralization and inflation. Compared to trust in institutions, they value individual sovereignty and verifiable monetary rules more. In their view, universal basic income often accompanies currency expansion, while Bitcoin is seen as a long-term hedge against uncertainty.
Additionally, the risks of automation replacing jobs as a priority and delayed income redistribution are frequently mentioned. Historical experience shows that there is often a time lag between policy promises and market changes, and savings and risk hedging remain important parts of personal finance. For this reason, many crypto investors still adhere to a “self-protection” logic.
Musk’s envisioned prosperity represents an aggressive and radical imagination of how technology could shape future society; meanwhile, the cautious stance of the Bitcoin community reflects long-term concerns about institutional stability and inflation risks. The collision of these two perspectives highlights the core disagreements in the AI era regarding wealth distribution, governance, and trust.