On February 11, the U.S. Southern District of New York Federal Court issued an important ruling, dismissing patent infringement claims brought by Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin Ltd. related to Bancor against Uniswap. Judge John G. Koeltl, in a memorandum opinion released on February 10, stated that the patents involved are essentially “abstract concepts” that do not meet the criteria for patent protection under U.S. patent law.
The case centered around the “constant product automated market maker” model, which is one of the core liquidity pricing mechanisms in decentralized finance. The plaintiffs claimed that Uniswap illegally used their automated pricing and liquidity pool technology, but the court found that these patents merely involve “fundamental economic practices of calculating currency exchange rates for trading,” and even when implemented on blockchain and smart contracts, they do not qualify for patent protection.
The judge further noted that deploying abstract formulas on blockchain infrastructure does not constitute a technological breakthrough with “inventive concepts,” and therefore cannot satisfy the two-step patent eligibility test established by the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to reasonably demonstrate how Uniswap’s open-source code includes the key parameters described in the patents. The complaint also had clear deficiencies regarding direct infringement, inducement, and willful infringement.
This ruling is a procedural victory for Uniswap but not a final decision. The court allowed the plaintiffs 21 days to file an amended complaint; otherwise, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Following the announcement, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams expressed optimism on social media, stating “We won.”
Industry experts believe that this case not only concerns the patent dispute between Uniswap and Bancor but could also set a precedent regarding whether core DeFi algorithms can be patented. As on-chain financial innovation continues to deepen, such judicial rulings will likely influence the technological boundaries and regulatory environment of the crypto industry.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Uniswap Grabs Early Win as US Judge Dismisses Bancor Patent Lawsuit
A New York federal court has dismissed a patent infringement suit brought by Bancor-affiliated entities against Uniswap, finding that the asserted claims describe abstract ideas that are not eligible for patent protection under US law. Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York
CryptoBreaking1h ago
U.S. court dismisses Bancor's patent lawsuit against Uniswap
A federal judge in New York dismissed a patent infringement lawsuit from Bancor against Uniswap, stating the patents involved referenced only abstract ideas. The court's ruling allows Bancor to amend its case within 21 days, or the dismissal becomes final.
TapChiBitcoin1h ago
Hayden Adams: Uniswap wins lawsuit against Bancor for patent infringement
Uniswap wins in lawsuit against Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin Ltd., with lawyers stating it did not infringe on related patents. Uniswap Labs reaffirms its protocol code is open source and opposes the allegations.
GateNewsBot8h ago
Data: 2.193 million UNI transferred from an anonymous address, worth approximately $7.43 million
ChainCatcher message indicates that at 02:14, 2.193 million UNI (worth approximately $7.43 million) were transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 0x9c98...) to another anonymous address (starting with 0xf129...).
GateNewsBot16h ago
a16z interview summary: Why do open networks always succeed?
The article discusses that the core issue of the global network is trust, not performance. Christian Catalini emphasizes that the concentration of control in enterprise chains makes it difficult for the market to trust their ability to create neutral monetary networks. In contrast, Bitcoin is favored for its historically verified neutrality. The article also proposes three dimensions of neutrality: rule neutrality, access neutrality, and利益 neutrality, and suggests that entrepreneurs consider their positioning to decide whether to open source and what strategies to adopt. Ultimately, whether to open source or not relates to the ability to establish an open network.
PANews02-06 00:01
Bitwise submits Uniswap ETF application to the SEC
Gate News bot message: Bitwise has filed Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to register for the issuance of the Bitwise Uniswap ETF, with registration number 0002107400. The ETF is based on $UNI.
GateNewsBot02-05 21:59
