BlockBeats News, February 13 — The People’s Court of Jing’an District, Shanghai, China, recently heard a case involving an improper profit-taking dispute caused by virtual currency investment. Ms. Wu was persuaded by a live stream host to invest 1.05 million yuan in virtual currency trading. After being unable to withdraw funds from the platform, she filed a lawsuit seeking compensation. However, her claims were dismissed in both the first and second trials, and she was ultimately responsible for bearing all losses herself. This final judgment serves as a warning to all investors who indulge in wishful thinking and blindly engage in virtual currency speculation.
In November 2019, Ms. Wu received a sales call and, under the guidance of a live stream investment host, downloaded a virtual currency trading app. Through this platform, Ms. Wu made successive investments totaling 1.05 million yuan, reaching agreements with eight sellers, including a transaction of 80,000 yuan with Mr. He. Later, Ms. Wu discovered that she could not log into the trading app, and the virtual currency worth 1.05 million yuan in her account on the platform could not be withdrawn.
In 2024, Ms. Wu reported the incident to the local public security authorities and filed a civil lawsuit in court, claiming that Mr. He should return the 80,000 yuan transaction amount on the grounds of improper profit. Mr. He argued that he was a member of a certain digital trading platform, was selling USDT digital currency through order placement, had not registered an account on the platform Ms. Wu referred to, and that the transaction was completed after the funds were received, so there was no improper profit.
After review, the Shanghai Jing’an District People’s Court held that, according to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, civil subjects engaging in civil activities must not violate laws or violate public order and good morals. In this case, the USDT involved is a virtual currency, which does not have the same legal status as legal tender. Activities related to virtual currency are considered illegal financial activities. Ms. Wu’s investment transactions involve virtual currency-related business activities, and trading virtual currency disrupts the national financial regulatory order, violating public order and good morals, and constitutes an invalid civil legal act. The losses arising from this should be borne by her alone. In conclusion, the Jing’an District People’s Court dismissed all claims filed by plaintiff Ms. Wu. Dissatisfied with the judgment, Ms. Wu appealed. After review, the second-instance court dismissed the appeal and upheld the original ruling.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Zerion Hot Wallet Loses $100K in AI-Driven Social Engineering Attack by North Korea-Linked Hackers
Zerion confirmed a recent AI-driven social engineering attack by North Korean hackers, resulting in a $100,000 loss from corporate hot wallets. User funds remain safe, and the company has taken precautionary measures. This follows another significant attack on Drift Protocol.
GateNews30m ago
Criticized for freezing USDC too slowly! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for a court order to freeze it—refusing to freeze it on our own
Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said that unless it receives a court order or a law-enforcement request, the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses. Even amid disputes over hackers allegedly laundering money and backlash from the community, Circle remains committed to operating in accordance with the rule of law.
Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line
-----------------------------
As developments surge across the global cryptocurrency market, at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire took a clear stance on the most sensitive issue in the market—“asset freezes.” He noted that while Circle has the technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or an official instruction from law-enforcement agencies, the company does not
CryptoCity1h ago
Can bypassing Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) regulations allow crypto purchases by card? Oding Ding introduces the Wallet Pro service for buying crypto with U.S. debit cards
OdinTing’s OwlPay and Wallet Pro services use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and partner with international payment giants to showcase its expansion ambitions in the fintech space. By operating from overseas, OdinTing bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, offering fast virtual asset trading. At the same time, in the face of the newly issued Virtual Asset Service Act, it is expected to become a reference template for other foreign-invested companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity2h ago
China's Shaoguan Branch of PBOC Issues Crypto Risk Warning, Cites Four Illegal Cases
The Shaoguan branch of the People's Bank of China issued a cryptocurrency risk warning, highlighting illegal activities like money laundering and scams. The public is urged to avoid crypto investments and report suspicious activities.
GateNews2h ago
Encourage innovation! U.S. judges ban Arizona from regulating prediction markets, pausing the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled that Arizona is barred from bringing charges against prediction market platform Kalshi under gambling laws, finding that the Federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in regulating financial markets. Kalshi, meanwhile, insists that its business falls under financial products rather than traditional gambling. Rulings by different states on prediction markets have varied, and the Trump family has also voiced support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity4h ago
Can bypass Taiwan Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) rules on buying crypto with credit cards be possible? OdinTech launches the Wallet Pro service for buying crypto with U.S. debit cards
OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by Odin Ding use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and they partner with international payment giants to showcase their ambitions to expand in the fintech sector. By operating from overseas, Odin Ding bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, offering fast virtual-asset trading. At the same time, in light of the newly issued Virtual Asset Services Act, it is expected to become a reference template for other foreign-funded companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity5h ago
