Odaily Planet Daily reports that the White House recently reiterated that U.S. President Donald Trump currently has no plans to pardon FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). Although SBF has been frequently posting on social media recently, attempting to garner political support, these efforts have not yet yielded results.
It is reported that SBF has been posting almost daily on X platform over the past few weeks, expressing support for Trump and his economic policies, criticizing the Democratic Party, and expressing dissatisfaction with the judge handling his case. He has also repeatedly claimed that “FTX has always been solvent,” but has not officially filed for a pardon.
Earlier media reports indicated that Trump had no intention of pardoning SBF. A White House official later reaffirmed this stance, citing Trump’s statement in an interview in January this year that he has no plans to pardon several well-known individuals, including SBF. However, the White House did not specify whether there might be policy changes in the future.
Although Trump has pardoned some well-known figures related to the crypto industry since taking office, analysts believe that the likelihood of SBF, who donated about $5.2 million to Biden’s campaign in 2020, receiving a pardon remains low.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
India's crypto regulatory gap sparks a rights protection dilemma: courts reject investors' claims, and fund freeze disputes escalate
February 25 News, the Delhi High Court recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of cryptocurrency investors against a certain crypto platform. Judge Prushaindra Kumar Kaurav pointed out that the platform is a private company and does not meet the definition of a "state" entity under Article 12 of the Constitution, therefore it cannot be subject to judicial intervention under Article 226. The petition lacks a legally admissible basis.
The lawsuit was initiated by investors such as Rana Handa and Aditya Malhotra, requesting the court to strengthen regulation of the crypto platform, and to direct the CBI or a special investigation team to intervene, as well as to unfreeze the user funds that are reportedly restricted. However, the court explicitly stated that ordering a criminal investigation is an extremely exceptional circumstance, and some complaints have not even completed the FIR process, which is insufficient to trigger a mandatory investigation mechanism.
GateNewsBot19m ago
Bitcoin Depot Requires ID for Every Crypto ATM Transaction
Bitcoin Depot has implemented a new policy mandating identification for every transaction at its ATMs to enhance compliance and reduce fraud. This change extends previous ID checks and responds to increased regulatory scrutiny and fraud concerns, notably following lawsuits from various states.
TheNewsCrypto2h ago
Jane Street faces insider trading allegations, raising suspicions behind the crypto crash
Jane Street faces allegations from Terraform Labs, claiming it profited by using non-public information to close positions early before the 2022 UST collapse. Jane Street denies the allegations, asserting that the trades were part of normal market-making activities. This case could impact the legal definition of insider trading within the cryptocurrency market. As a major crypto market maker, Jane Street's trading activities are often scrutinized during significant market events, but it has not yet been found legally liable by regulatory authorities.
MarketWhisper2h ago
