BIP-110 Sparks Bitcoin Civil War! Should Inscriptions Be Restricted? Adam Back Furious, "Mobs Attack," 55% Threshold Is Dividing the Community
BIP-110 Technical Proposal Attempts to Limit On-Chain Non-Currency Data Storage via Soft Fork Sparks Intense Value Debate Since 2017 "Block Size War" — Supporters Say It’s About "Restoring Order," Opponents Like Adam Back Denounce It as "Mob Attack."
(Background: Do you agree that BIP-110 is a prerequisite for Bitcoin reaching $1 million?)
(Additional context: Bitcoin Core v30 update "Enables OP_RETURN," Opponents Burn: Decentralization Is Dead)
Table of Contents
Toggle
The Past and Present of BIP-110 — Directly Targeting the Inscription Protocol
55% Activation Threshold Sparks Controversy — Mob Attack or Decentralization?
Factions Clash — Minimalism May Cut Off Miners’ Revenue
Imbalance in Fee Market Competition — Governance
(Background: Do you agree that BIP-110 is a prerequisite for Bitcoin reaching $1 million?)
(Additional context: Bitcoin Core v30 update "Enables OP_RETURN," Opponents Burn: Decentralization Is Dead)
Table of Contents
Toggle
The Past and Present of BIP-110 — Directly Targeting the Inscription Protocol
55% Activation Threshold Sparks Controversy — Mob Attack or Decentralization?
Factions Clash — Minimalism May Cut Off Miners’ Revenue
Imbalance in Fee Market Competition — Governance
