2026-01-13 17:39:31

In this ecosystem, public opinion is a double-edged sword. There are supporters, and there are critics — these voices are part of growth, unavoidable and inescapable.

I have long realized one thing: individual strength is limited. The success or failure of a project cannot be reversed by anyone's persistence, but what I can control are my own choices. That is to continue building and not change course because of external evaluations.

Thank you all for your understanding and support during this time. Some things need to be reorganized, and some paths need to be retraced. But the direction remains unchanged — focus on doing what needs to be done, and dedicate time and energy to what truly matters.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoetryOnChain

· 14h ago

Public opinion is like that—there will always be people criticizing and praising. The key is how you choose to respond. Keep going and don't let those voices hijack you.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 14h ago

The words sound nice, but this set of logic has been heard quite a few times in this circle. Actions speak louder than words; don't just shout slogans and call it a day. Reorganize and start over... Is it really impossible to change this time? It sounds like trying to make up for previous decisions, but indeed someone has to be willing to persist. This ecosystem only accepts this approach; words are less convincing than facts.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 14h ago

Listen to this, it's the same old tune of "I only focus on building, no criticism allowed." On-chain data speaks for itself, brother. Projects with real strength have long let the numbers do the talking. --- Let's talk about increasing the concentration of funds first. Who still dares to just "reorganize" and walk away? I just want to see if this "new path" will be the same as last time. --- I've seen too many of these statements. The key questions are whether the smart contract has been audited and whether large holder addresses have recently moved. These are the hard indicators. --- Reorganize? I'm more concerned about what those suspicious addresses have been doing lately. Guess how many wallet records I checked... --- Anyone can say nice words, but they are unwilling to disclose on-chain financial data. How am I supposed to believe? --- This is a typical "I've made up my mind, do as you will" attitude. When will public opinion, this double-edged sword, really hurt the project itself? We'll see. --- Hmm, looks familiar. Another project said the same thing last month, and now that large holder address has already placed an order on the exchange.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_surfer

· 14h ago

Keep going and it'll be done. Don't listen to those who are talking nonsense outside. Build it if it needs to be built.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 14h ago

Listen to this, and it's quite clear-headed. Public opinion is like that, one voice on the left, another on the right, but ultimately it's what you can do yourself. The direction remains unchanged, so just keep going, after all, this circle is never short of noise. Reorganize, restart, sounds like you're about to stir up trouble again? Stay tuned.

View OriginalReply0