# 比特币价格反弹

#比特币价格反弹 Looking at Eugene's trading logic, this profit-taking strategy is actually worth pondering. After achieving a rebound target of 94,000, most positions were closed, leaving only the core holdings. This move may seem conservative, but in fact, it is using certain gains to hedge against uncertain risks—oscillations between 94,000 and 100,000 can easily disturb the mindset. Rather than getting entangled here, it's better to wait for clearer directional signals.
I quite agree with this approach. The core of copying trades is not to pursue maximum profits in every market wave, but to stabl

#比特币价格反弹 Bitcoin breaks through $93,000, wow the rebound strength is really fierce🔥
The decline at the end of last year almost blew my mind, but now with the support at $88,000 not broken, it directly reversed and broke above $92,000, with a stable bullish structure on the 100-hour moving average. The next target is $95,000, then aiming for the $120,000-$150,000 range. Analysts are all bullish, and I’m following this rhythm🚀
Even more outrageous is that altcoins are also dancing along, with old meme coins like BONK, BOME, WIF, PEPE leading the rally. Market liquidity has returned, and inst

#比特币价格反弹 When Bitcoin rebounds, the most important thing to watch is not the percentage increase, but who is admitting losses and fleeing. This time, the data is very interesting — realized losses of $511 million versus profits of $312 million, with losses still leading. But it is precisely this "surrender-style selling" that deserves the most attention.
Anyone who has experienced several cycles knows that the cruelest moment in the market is often not the crash itself, but the panic selling by retail investors forced to cut losses when the rebound arrives. What does this indicate? The bottom

#比特币价格反弹 Seeing Bitcoin rebound from $80,000 in November to $94,000, many are starting to get restless again. I want to share some insights into the real meaning behind the on-chain data.
The "Profit/Loss Supply Ratio" rebounded from 0.013 to 0.45, which looks like a clear bottoming signal. Historically, whenever this indicator hits a low, it has indeed corresponded to significant bottoms—verified in 2011, 2015, 2018, and 2022. This time is no exception. But there's an easily overlooked detail: a top-level indicator far below 100 only shows *there's still room to rise*, it doesn't mean this s

Oh my god, I just saw some on-chain data analysis and I was a bit shocked!😍
They say that Bitcoin bottomed out in late November when it dropped to $80,000? The key is using a ratio called "Profit Supply / Loss Supply" to judge this. When this ratio drops to 0.013, it has historically always corresponded to major bottoms—like in 2011, 2015, 2018, and 2022.
At that time, the loss supply of short-term holders surged to 2.45 million coins, basically a "mass sell-off" scene, while the profit supply was only 30,000 coins. What does this mean? Probably that a large number of beginners and short-term

#比特币价格反弹 Seeing the chip data from this rebound, my mind immediately flashed back to several key points before the 2017 bull market. Murphy's analysis triggered an old observation of mine — whenever the chip concentration shifts from rising to falling, it often indicates a subtle change in market sentiment.
The $87,000 level has accumulated 822,000 BTC, a volume not unfamiliar in history. I remember similar chip accumulation during the rebound at the end of 2015, and the subsequent trend was a steady upward move. Of course, the market capacity and participant composition were completely diffe

#比特币价格反弹 The logic behind Bitcoin's rebound is quite interesting — it's not created out of thin air, but a result of macroeconomic game theory. Recently, I’ve seen analyses from institutions, and the core takeaway is: expectations of large-scale money printing are strengthening.
The US government, in order to stimulate the economy, control oil prices, and win votes, will inevitably initiate deficit spending and credit expansion, in other words, flooding the market with liquidity. Think about where this excess dollar liquidity will flow? Traditional assets are saturated, but assets like Bitcoi

#比特币价格反弹 After reviewing Arthur Hayes's latest insights, the logical chain remains quite clear: increased oil supply from Venezuela → downward pressure on oil prices → large-scale deficit spending driven by economic stimulus needs → Federal Reserve coordinating money printing → liquidity flooding the market. Under this expectation, Bitcoin, as a hard asset hedge against fiat devaluation, indeed stands to benefit.
Key signals to watch include: first, whether the Federal Reserve's actual easing pace will truly follow through, which determines the extent of liquidity release; second, Maelstrom i

#比特币价格反弹 Seeing this wave of data is quite interesting — realized losses of $511 million versus profits of $312 million, and many people still choose to cut losses during the rebound. This is actually a good phenomenon; historically, this kind of "surrender-like selling" often signals that the adjustment cycle is nearing its end.
The key point is that the strength of this round of clearing has already approached the level of the previous bear market, indicating that the market has basically released the accumulated panic. In other words, the turnover of chips in the bottom area is already suf

#比特币价格反弹 Bitcoin rebounds to 94,000, Eugene's move this time is quite rational. Most of the positions have been taken profit, leaving only the core longs, which is the strategy of a prudent player. The key is that he is uncertain about the 94,000 to 100,000 range, so he prefers to wait for a breakthrough of 100,000 before acting. Instead of getting tangled at this price level, it's better to observe — this logic makes sense.
Institutions are also very cautious now, everyone is watching whether they can break through the psychological barrier of 100,000. January is usually a volatile month, so