Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, MasterCard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
P2P Loan
Grow your wealth in fiat investment
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
tag
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Diğerleri
TradFi
13周年庆
Rewards
SIG

Signet Jewelers Ltd Price

SIG
$93,38
+$0,46(+%0,49)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-14 20:59 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-14 20:59, Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) is priced at $93,38, with a total market cap of $3,77B, a P/E ratio of 12,94, and a dividend yield of %1,37. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $92,99 and $94,26. The current price is %0,41 above the day's low and %0,93 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 432,49K. Over the past 52 weeks, SIG has traded between $80,54 to $94,50, and the current price is -%1,18 away from the 52-week high.

SIG Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$93,63
Market Cap$3,77B
Volume432,49K
P/E Ratio12,94
Dividend Yield (TTM)%1,37
Dividend Amount$0,35
Diluted EPS (TTM)7,25
Net Income (FY)$294,40M
Revenue (FY)$6,81B
Earnings Date2026-06-02
EPS Estimate1,38
Revenue Estimate$1,55B
Shares Outstanding40,35M
Beta (1Y)1.25
Ex-Dividend Date2026-04-24
Dividend Payment Date2026-05-22

About SIG

Signet Jewelers Limited operates as a diamond jewelry retailer. It operates through three segments: North America, International, and Other. The North America segment operates jewelry stores in jewelry stores in malls, mall-based kiosks, and off-mall locations in the United States and Canada primarily under the Kay Jewelers, Kay Jewelers Outlet, Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry, Jared Vault, Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet, Diamonds Direct, James Allen, Banter by Piercing Pagoda, and Peoples Jewellers names, as well as operates online through JamesAllen.com and Rocksbox. The International segment operates stores in shopping malls and off-mall locations primarily under the H.Samuel and Ernest Jones brands in the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, and Channel Islands. The Other segment is involved in the purchase and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones, as well as the provision of diamond polishing services. As of January 29, 2022, it operated 2,854 stores and kiosks. Signet Jewelers Limited is based in Hamilton, Bermuda.
SectorConsumer Cyclical
IndustryLuxury Goods
CEOJames Kevin Symancyk
HeadquartersHamilton,None,BM
Official Websitehttps://www.signetjewelers.com

Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) FAQ

What's the stock price of Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) today?

x
Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) is currently trading at $93,38, with a 24h change of +%0,49. The 52-week trading range is $80,54–$94,50.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)?

x

Should you buy or sell Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)?

x

How to buy Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

SIG
CFD
Trade

Hot Posts About Signet Jewelers Ltd (SIG)

BlackRiderCryptoLord

BlackRiderCryptoLord

8 hours ago
#SECDeFiNoBrokerNeeded THE SEC JUST DREW THE LINE - AND DeFi STANDS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF IT On April 13, 2026, the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets dropped one of the most consequential staff statements in crypto's regulatory history under its ongoing Project Crypto initiative. The conclusion is direct, significant, and long overdue: certain crypto asset interfaces, including DeFi front-ends, wallet extensions, DEX user interfaces, and non-custodial transaction tools, do NOT need to register as broker-dealers under federal securities law, provided they operate within a clearly defined set of conditions. This is not speculation. This is the U.S. securities regulator formally articulating where the line falls between a regulated broker and a permissionless software interface. Years of legal ambiguity, enforcement uncertainty, and chilling effects on DeFi builders across the United States are now being addressed head-on by the same agency that once made "regulation by enforcement" its default strategy for the entire crypto sector. The shift in posture is deliberate, documented, and carries real weight for developers, protocols, and users globally. What the SEC Actually Said - and Why It Matters The staff statement is precise on its conditions. To qualify for exemption from broker-dealer registration, a crypto asset interface must satisfy five core requirements simultaneously. There is no partial credit here; all five must hold. First, the interface must be fully non-custodial. Users must control their own private keys and their own funds at every stage of a transaction. The moment a platform takes even momentary custody of a user's assets, the calculus changes entirely, and traditional broker-dealer rules re-enter the picture. Second, the interface cannot provide investment advice, recommendations, or any commentary that steers a user toward a specific transaction or asset. Neutral display of available options is permitted. Ranking assets as "trending," suggesting allocations, or surfacing curated picks based on any internal logic that influences user behavior would likely cross the line. Third, the interface must not perform order routing or execution decisions on behalf of the user. It serves purely as a connection layer between the user and the underlying protocol. The interface is a bridge, not an intermediary with discretion. No directing of trades to specific liquidity venues, no execution matching, no middleman layer that sits between a user's intention and the blockchain's response. Fourth, fees charged by the interface must be fixed and neutral. Variable spreads, payment for order flow, commission structures that depend on trade outcomes, or any economic incentive that could introduce a conflict of interest would disqualify the interface from exemption. Flat, objective, disclosed fees are acceptable. Anything that blurs the line between a tool and a financial service provider is not. Fifth and finally, the user must retain full control over all transaction parameters at all times. The interface cannot exercise any discretion over how a transaction is structured, sequenced, batched, or executed. No front-running, no reordering of transactions for the platform's benefit, no intervention in the user's decision-making process. These five conditions together define what the SEC considers a genuinely neutral, non-intermediary software interface. Meet all five, and the platform sits outside the broker-dealer registration regime. Fail any one of them, and the regulatory analysis shifts dramatically. The Broader Regulatory Context This statement does not exist in a vacuum. It follows a consistent pattern of recalibration that began with the Trump administration's January 2025 executive order directing federal agencies to protect the right to develop and deploy software, participate in blockchain validation, transact without censorship, and maintain self-custody. The SEC's Project Crypto task force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, has since produced a series of staff statements, FAQ updates, and no-action signals that cumulatively represent the most substantial pivot in U.S. crypto regulatory posture in a decade. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, established the first federal framework for payment stablecoins. In early 2026, the SEC extended that momentum by clarifying that broker-dealers can treat stablecoin holdings as regulatory capital, a quiet but structurally important change that opens the door to far broader institutional participation in tokenized markets. The CLARITY Act, advancing through the House Financial Services and Agriculture Committees with bipartisan support, is pushing further still, targeting a comprehensive digital asset market structure framework that would expand CFTC authority over spot crypto markets and define registration obligations for digital asset intermediaries with far greater precision than currently exists. The broker-dealer staff statement released on April 13 fits squarely within this arc. It is the SEC saying, clearly and on the record: permissionless, non-custodial, neutral software is not a financial intermediary. Code that merely connects users to decentralized protocols does not become a regulated entity simply because securities can flow through it. What This Means for Protocols and Builders The implications are substantial. Protocols like Uniswap, whose front-end has operated in a persistent state of legal uncertainty despite the underlying protocol being immutable and decentralized, now have a clearer framework to evaluate their compliance posture. MetaMask and comparable self-custodial wallets that present options neutrally and do not route orders or provide guidance are well-positioned under this framework. DEX aggregators that perform routing logic, surfaces that provide yield recommendations, and platforms that earn variable fees tied to execution quality will need to examine their models more carefully. The statement does not grant blanket immunity to anything calling itself "DeFi." It is a functional test, not a label test. The question is not whether a platform describes itself as decentralized. The question is whether it actually operates in the manner described: non-custodial, neutral, passthrough, flat-fee, and discretion-free. Platforms that claim DeFi aesthetics while retaining centralized control over order flow or providing active guidance to users will not benefit from this clarity. For genuine builders, however, this is a meaningful reduction in legal risk. The cost of operating a compliant DeFi interface in the United States just became clearer, and in many cases lower. That has direct consequences for where development talent and capital flow. Projects that previously structured offshore specifically to avoid U.S. regulatory exposure now have a defined path to operating legally within the U.S. regulatory perimeter, provided they adhere strictly to the framework articulated. The Self-Custody Principle as Safe Harbor One of the most important conceptual anchors in the SEC's statement is its treatment of self-custody as the primary marker of a non-intermediary relationship. The logic is coherent: a broker exists to hold and manage assets on behalf of clients. If a platform never holds a user's assets and never controls how those assets move, the foundational rationale for broker-dealer regulation does not apply. This is the SEC essentially codifying, in regulatory language, what the crypto space has argued from the beginning. Control of private keys is not just a technical preference. It is the structural fact that determines whether a financial intermediary relationship exists. Self-custody is not merely a feature. Under this framework, it is the condition that defines the boundary between regulated finance and open-access software infrastructure. That framing matters because it has implications well beyond DeFi interfaces. It sets a principle that could inform how regulators approach wallets, custody solutions, multi-sig arrangements, and smart contract systems more broadly as the legislative framework matures. Where the Gaps Remain This is a staff statement, not a formal rulemaking. It does not carry the force of a regulation promulgated through notice-and-comment. A future SEC leadership team could revisit or withdraw it. Congressional legislation that codifies these boundaries would provide far stronger and more durable protection for the ecosystem. The CLARITY Act and related digital asset market structure bills remain critical for that reason. Furthermore, the statement applies specifically to interfaces facilitating crypto asset securities transactions. Assets outside the securities definition, and the question of what constitutes a crypto asset security versus a commodity remains contested in multiple ongoing legislative and regulatory proceedings, exist in a separate analytical space. The CFTC retains jurisdiction over digital commodity spot markets, and the coordination between SEC and CFTC frameworks will be a defining regulatory question for the next several years. State-level regulation adds another layer. Several U.S. states maintain money transmission or digital asset license requirements that operate independently of federal securities law. A platform exempt from SEC broker-dealer registration may still need to evaluate its obligations under state frameworks, particularly for interfaces that facilitate transfers of value rather than purely securities transactions. The Directional Signal Is Clear Even accounting for its limitations as a non-binding staff statement, the April 13 clarification represents a significant directional commitment by the SEC's current leadership. The message to the market is unmistakable: the United States intends to be a viable jurisdiction for DeFi development and deployment, and the agency is willing to articulate workable safe harbors rather than leaving developers to self-censor or relocate. For anyone building decentralized infrastructure, running a non-custodial wallet product, operating a neutral DEX interface, or simply trying to understand whether their protocol touches regulated territory under U.S. law, this statement is required reading. It does not answer every question. But it answers the right one first: do you need to register as a broker just because crypto trades through your interface? Under the specified conditions, the answer is now formally no. The permissionless internet of value is not a broker-dealer. The SEC said so. That is worth noting.
5
1
0
1
MevWhisperer

MevWhisperer

04-13 18:10
Been thinking about this a lot lately - the shift we're seeing with institutional crypto investors entering the market is honestly one of the biggest story arcs in digital assets right now. When I first got into crypto, it was mostly retail traders and tech enthusiasts moving the needle. But over the past decade, something fundamental changed. Now you've got banks, hedge funds, asset managers, corporations - all these massive organizations looking seriously at blockchain. And that's not just noise. When institutions show up, they bring real capital, real infrastructure, real standards. Here's what I've noticed: these big players don't just yolo into new markets. They want security, clear rules, reliable systems. That's actually been good for everyone. It's forced the industry to level up. Better platforms, stronger compliance, actual custody solutions that make sense. The security piece is huge for institutional crypto investors. When you're managing billions, you can't just keep your keys on an exchange. That's why custody services became such a big deal. Cold storage, multi-sig approvals, insurance - these aren't fancy extras anymore, they're table stakes. Institutions need to know their assets are actually protected before they commit serious capital. Then there's regulation. Honestly, this is where a lot of people got it wrong. Institutions don't see regulation as the enemy - they see it as confidence. They operate in heavily regulated industries already. So when governments started building actual frameworks for crypto, it wasn't a threat to institutional crypto investors, it was a green light. Compliance procedures, KYC systems, AML monitoring - this stuff lets them trade without constantly looking over their shoulder. What's really interesting is the opportunities that emerged because of this institutional wave. Tokenized assets are becoming real. Real estate, bonds, commodities - all moving onto blockchain. Faster settlement, easier trading, better liquidity. Enterprise blockchain platforms are scaling up to handle the volume and security requirements these organizations need. The whole market is starting to look different because of this. More professional, more stable, more like actual financial markets. Institutional crypto investors are basically pulling the entire ecosystem toward maturity. And yeah, there's still plenty of uncertainty and regulatory gray areas, but the trajectory is pretty clear. This is the next phase.
0
0
0
0
ProxyCollector

ProxyCollector

04-11 20:10
I've just noticed a quite alarming trend in the crypto space lately. Crypto crimes are becoming more brutal, especially what's called "gunpoint attacks" — basically physical theft with violence to seize digital assets. The numbers have skyrocketed, with a 75% increase throughout this year. It's really scary when you think about it. This type of attack basically targets individuals known to hold significant crypto assets. Perpetrators use physical violence to force victims to transfer or open their wallets. It's no longer just pure digital crime, but a hybrid attack that combines online intelligence with offline intimidation. What’s interesting is how the crypto community is becoming more security-conscious. Serious people are starting to invest in hardware security, multi-sig wallets, and stricter operational security. Security isn’t just about strong passwords anymore, but also protecting yourself from physical threats. Data this year shows a concerning pattern — crypto crimes are evolving to become more sophisticated and violent. It’s not just about hacking wallets, but targeted attacks on individuals. The key to protecting yourself is to stay low-profile, diversify storage methods, and honestly, don’t broadcast your holdings on social media. The crypto community needs to take personal security more seriously. It’s not paranoia, just being realistic about the risks involved. From the community discussions I’ve seen, many are starting to implement better practices — hidden wallets, decoy accounts, even physical security measures. The key to survival in this space now includes awareness and proactive protection.
1
0
0
0