Let's start with the conclusion: it is too arbitrary to label any project as "eyewash" or "reliable". Such matters need to be validated over time and also depend on what regulatory authorities say.

However, we can start with this white paper and discuss what dangerous signals it hides. To be honest, the vision of this project is indeed big—but it is precisely this "big" that makes people feel a bit uneasy.

**🚨 First, look at a few common pitfalls**

**The vision is too grand, too grand to feel real**
The project aims to tackle world-class challenges such as "AI agent payment", "global tax compliance", and "automatically generating tax receipts for various countries". Sounds impressive, right? But upon closer examination: these involve blockchain technology, artificial intelligence, and the incredibly complex financial regulatory laws of different countries. For a startup team to take all of this on? The possibility is negligible.

This kind of trick is actually quite common – painting a picture of a future that sounds particularly impressive but is also unattainable, making you ignore the fact that the current product has nothing to offer.

**The technical description is a bit vague**
The white paper indeed piles up a lot of technical terms: x402b protocol (yes, the one from a certain compliance platform), EIP-3009, BNB Greenfield... It looks quite substantial. But the question arises: how are these concepts combined to achieve "automatic generation of multi-country tax receipts"? What is the key technical pathway? What about the details?

Basically none.

It seems more like piecing together several of the hottest concepts at the moment to create a technical vibe. But if it's really going to take off? Then let's