#加密市场回调 When top opinion leaders in the tech circle suddenly publicly praise a political figure's encryption stance, the signals released behind this are far more complex than what appears on the surface.

A recent trend worth noting is that a former U.S. leader has publicly announced support for encryption, labeling himself as "crypto-friendly." Following this, the Tesla CEO quickly retweeted and stated, "industry safety is crucial," and also thanked the individual for their earlier positive remarks in the comments section.

Interestingly, these two have had their share of exchanges in the past. One once hinted to the other that "it might be time to consider retirement," while the other retorted that he was "talking nonsense." Now, with their attitudes making a 180-degree turn, it's quite thought-provoking.

The underlying logic of the transformation is actually very clear:

The current regulatory environment puts significant pressure on both technological innovation and the digital asset industry. The uncertainty of policies and the surge in compliance costs are changing many people's alignment choices. One side needs the endorsement and traffic support of tech giants, while the other side hopes for a more favorable policy window period – a typical logic of interest exchange.

A more concerning trend is that capital forces are increasingly intervening directly in the setting of public agendas. From acquiring social media platforms to frequently voicing policy topics, certain entrepreneurs are no longer satisfied with a purely commercial role, but are attempting to use traffic and capital to directly influence the political game rules.

A public square controlling the information of hundreds of millions of users, a political symbol with a large base of supporters. Once this combination takes shape, its impact on the entire industry ecosystem should not be underestimated.

The community's response is polarized: some believe this is "a backlash of the free market against excessive regulation," while others question that "ordinary investors are just pawns in the game of the big players."

What do you think? Will this statement on the policy shift ultimately bring substantial benefits to the encryption industry, or is it just another round of speculation?