🎉 Gate Square — Share Your Funniest Crypto Moments & Win a $100 Joy Fund!
Crypto can be stressful, so let’s laugh it out on Gate Square.
Whether it’s a liquidation tragedy, FOMO madness, or a hilarious miss—you name it.
Post your funniest crypto moment and win your share of the Joy Fund!
💰 Rewards
10 creators with the funniest posts
Each will receive $10 in tokens
📝 How to Join
1⃣️ Follow Gate_Square
2⃣️ Post with the hashtag #MyCryptoFunnyMoment
3⃣️ Any format works: memes, screenshots, short videos, personal stories, fails, chaos—bring it on.
📌 Notes
Hashtag #MyCryptoFunnyMoment is requi
ESG Rating System: A Case Study in How Numbers Lie
Elon Musk just called out one of the most absurd metrics in investing today—ESG scores. His evidence? Tobacco giant Philip Morris scored 84/100 while Tesla only got 37/100. Yeah, you read that right.
Let’s break down the ridiculousness:
The scorecard nobody asked for:
Why this matters for investors: Billions of dollars flow into high-ESG stocks thanks to asset managers like BlackRock treating these scores like gospel. Higher ESG = more inflows = artificially inflated valuations. But here’s the catch: the rating system is fundamentally broken.
The defense (and why it’s weak): ESG advocates claim Tesla scores well on environmental but tanks on social/governance metrics. Fine. But that weighted system still makes tobacco companies look better than the company literally accelerating the world’s transition to clean energy. That’s not analysis—that’s theater.
What’s really happening: Companies are gaming the system through greenwashing and corporate theater. Meanwhile, ESG funds keep flowing while the fundamental premise—that higher ESG = better returns AND better world—remains unproven and increasingly questionable.
This isn’t Musk being contrarian for clicks. This is pointing out that one of Wall Street’s biggest trending metrics might be solving for the wrong problem entirely.