2026-01-05 16:26:21

Looking at the current financial system, centralized institutions freely issue excessive currency, causing people's money to become increasingly worthless. It's like the chaos caused by the feudal lords' division of territory in ancient times—each lord minting their own coins, making life difficult for common people.

Bitcoin solves this problem. It replaces the traditional central banking issuance mechanism with cryptography and computational consensus, with a fixed total supply of 21 million coins, never exceeding this amount. This scarcity is as tangible and credible as precious metals.

More importantly, Bitcoin requires no license to participate, and transactions cannot be unilaterally frozen or censored. This is true financial freedom—the assets fully belong to you, not controlled by any institution. Blockchain technology ensures this transparency and security, with every transaction witnessed and recorded by the network.

This is not just a new currency, but a whole new financial paradigm. In an era of devaluing centralized currencies, using decentralized consensus mechanisms to protect individual asset sovereignty is the future direction of finance. $BTC

BTC0.13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WenAirdrop

· 01-08 13:15

Hey, your logic isn't wrong either, just feels a bit idealistic... but how does it work in practice? --- The crypto world always talks about freedom, but when prices really drop, no one seems to be able to escape. --- I believe in the total supply of 21 million, but it just feels like mining is getting harder and harder, and small retail investors are getting more and more squeezed. --- That ancient analogy of feudal lords dividing up territory is spot on. Wait, aren't these exchanges now also "dividing up" territory? --- Decentralization sounds great, but if I lose my keys, my coins are really gone. Have we discussed this risk? --- You're right, but it just feels like I've heard it a hundred times... The real problem is that ordinary people simply don't have that much spare money to hedge against inflation. --- What I'm most afraid of is policy sudden cuts; even if we go decentralized, we still have to obey. --- Actually, the most useless part is the freezing of transactions. Many countries have already implemented on-chain real-name verification.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 01-08 10:37

Hey, wait a minute. Are 21 million coins really enough for the global population? Unless we all hold coins with a bunch of zeros after the decimal point.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-05 16:56

Hey, wait a minute. Are 21 million really enough to distribute? When calculated based on the global population, each person would get just a tiny fraction.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 01-05 16:56

Hey, you're right. The money printing machine is running non-stop now, and our wages can't keep up with the devaluation rate. But what really attracts me is the uncensored part—being in control of my own money, isn't that what it's all about? Wait, are 21 million coins really enough for global use? I need to think about that logic some more. It sounds like a sales pitch, but on second thought... there's no problem with it. Everyone puts their money on the blockchain, and banks would have to die, right? I kind of want to see that day. By the way, I've heard this theory too many times. The key is that most people are still living with fiat currency. I believe in BTC's future, but I don't believe that people who switch everything over now won't get cut.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-05 16:51

Oh, you're right... The money in my wallet is really running out more and more. I love the fixed cap of 21 million; I no longer have to worry about it being infinitely diluted someday. This is truly holding onto something of my own...

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPhobia

· 01-05 16:33

Wow, that analogy is brilliant. The part about the feudal lords dividing up the territory really hit me in the heart. The fact that there is never an oversupply is truly a game-changer. Just look at the M2 growth rate over the past two years... My money has been diluted like this. But on the other hand, we still need to stay cautious and be wary of history repeating itself with the sucker investors. Different countries have different circumstances. Some people might come up with some new tricks later on, and that's hard to predict. But regardless, Bitcoin at least gives us an option, and that alone is worth it. The fixed total supply is definitely a confidence that other cryptocurrencies can't learn from.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-05 16:29

ngl the fixed supply argument keeps falling flat when we factor in MEV extraction across lightning network routing... btc's scarcity narrative conveniently ignores liquidity fragmentation across layer 2s

Reply0

NestedFox

· 01-05 16:27

The analogy of feudal lords dividing up territory is spot on, that's exactly the feeling. Now with the central bank's excessive issuance, our money is directly devalued, and no one cares about our lives. To be honest, Bitcoin's mechanism indeed bypasses this centralized bloodsucking drum. Fixed total supply and immutability—that's what a real safe is.

View OriginalReply0