How many times have you truly blown your positions in decentralized finance due to misjudging the direction? Honestly, most of the disasters I've seen are not like that. The real knives are often in the dark—those unseen data traps.



At 3 a.m., your position is mysteriously pierced by a strange K-line; the assets you collateralized suddenly get marked down, and the system automatically liquidates; a contract you predicted correctly, but on-chain data shows the opposite result... These magical scenes are usually orchestrated by the same black hand—the one feeding data to the smart contract.

Blockchain has a fatal flaw: it does the accounting perfectly but knows nothing about the external world. Price fluctuations, game results, market data... all rely on oracles as the "middlemen" to relay information. Once this information channel is poisoned, even the most perfect contract logic can't save you.

APRO has identified this pain point. It doesn't dream of a hundredfold coin; it just wants to do one thing—fix the "disease" of on-chain data.

How to fix it? It follows three stages: First stage, AI performs preliminary detection. Incoming data is first scanned by AI—not to make it tell stories, but to act as a "detector"—identifying abnormal fluctuations (50% price change within a second), contradictions among multi-source data, and suspicious witch attack patterns. Bad data is intercepted before it even gets on-chain.

Second stage, independent validation by a node group. Data approved by AI must also pass through a "review committee" composed of staked nodes. Each node verifies independently, and only after reaching consensus can it be finally recorded on-chain. With real stakes involved, no one dares to mess around.

Third stage—this is the most ruthless—on-chain transparent backtracking. All data flow processes are recorded on-chain. Once an anomaly occurs, anyone with dirty hands will be exposed by a simple ledger review.

In short, it's a multi-layer defense: AI detection → node consensus → on-chain traceability. With this setup, anyone trying to profit from data poisoning will have to think twice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 01-08 21:34
Being liquidated at 3 a.m. really resonated with me. Oracles are indeed the Achilles' heel of the entire ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-08 17:24
I've experienced being penetrated at 3 a.m., but to be honest, the oracle issue is way more serious than I imagined.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 01-08 14:10
The feeling of being penetrated at 3 a.m. is truly incredible. At that time, I thought I had misread the market, but later I realized I was exploited by the oracle. This AI plus node verification approach sounds reliable, definitely a hundred times better than the current black-box oracles. But to be honest, does staking necessarily guarantee honesty? It also depends on whether the penalty and confiscation mechanisms are strict enough.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 01-06 03:52
I really resonate with the part about being wiped out at 3 a.m., it’s truly a bit unsettling... The oracle issue is indeed a tumor.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 01-06 03:50
Getting liquidated at 3 a.m. really hit home; I am that guy. Oracle data has tricked me in the past several times.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 01-06 03:48
Being punctured at three in the morning really hit me in the heart. I've also experienced this bizarre liquidation... Data poisoning is indeed an invisible killer.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 01-06 03:45
I truly feel the pain of that 3 a.m. cut; oracles are indeed a minefield. Multi-layer verification sounds good, but the key is whether the nodes will really hold the line.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461vip
· 01-06 03:25
I remember being overwhelmed at 3 a.m. that time, and I really doubted the oracle, but now it seems like I just didn't set a stop-loss... The three-layer defense of APRO sounds reliable, but I wonder if the cost will become a new liquidation point again.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 01-06 03:23
I've seen too many reentrancy attacks on oracles. This three-layer defense framework looks good, but the details determine life or death.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)