Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
ETH current price hovers around $3,110, down 1.32% in a day, repeatedly fluctuating within the $3,058 to $3,152 range. Someone is considering borrowing 100,000 yuan to add to their position, aiming to bring the holding cost up to $3,300. This idea seems logically supported, but risks are hidden in the details.
Let's start with the opportunity side. Etherealize analyst Vivek Raman has made a bold prediction — by 2026, Ethereum could rise to $15,000, which is five times the current price. More concretely, giants like JPMorgan and BlackRock have already laid out tokenization products within the Ethereum ecosystem, and the influx of large funds is continuously delivering value to ETH. From a technical perspective, since late December last year, ETH has formed a typical "bottoming higher, top also higher" ascending structure. Although it has repeatedly faced resistance above $3,300, recent pullbacks with shrinking volume are more about profit-taking than a genuine reversal signal. Once it breaks through the key resistance at $3,350, there is a short-term opportunity to explore the range of $3,700 to $4,100.
But the pitfalls here should also be taken seriously. Borrowing to increase position ultimately means leverage, which involves risks of interest and forced liquidation. From $3,110 to $3,300, it seems only a 6.1% increase is needed, which doesn't seem far. The problem is, if the market turns downward and breaks below the $3,000 support level, it could drop straight to $2,600 or even lower. At that point, not only would costs be unmanageable, but leverage would amplify losses, and with the loan pressure, watching assets evaporate would be a double blow.