2026-01-09 23:35:46

We're committed to the long-term growth of this project. Our strategy focuses on bringing quality voices to the community—partnering with influential creators who genuinely support what we're building. The content pipeline stays strong, and the momentum keeps building through authentic community engagement.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSunnyDay

· 20h ago

That long-term approach, just listen to it; the key is still to see when the shipment will come.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 20h ago

Long-term commitment, huh? Then let the data speak for itself. Don't just talk trash.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 20h ago

Alright, here comes another set of claims about "long-term commitment" and "authentic community." I'm a bit tired of hearing it, but it does seem like they're genuinely looking for reliable creators. This approach is not bad.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 20h ago

It's that authentic engagement thing again... The question is, do creators really care, or are they just doing it for the split rewards?

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 20h ago

Sounds good, but it's just relying on big influencers for endorsement. Can't you stabilize the fundamentals first before hyping it up?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekConfession

· 20h ago

Long-termism sounds good, but the key still depends on whether the creator truly believes or is just trying to make a quick profit.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 20h ago

It seems to be the same old "long-term commitment" rhetoric... The question is, how to define "quality voices"? What mechanism ensures that these KOLs won't become arbitrage tools? Historically, such collaborations have always turned into利益输送 (benefit transfer), it depends on the specific incentive-compatible design.

View OriginalReply0