The recent market volatility has indeed been intense. When Bitcoin dropped below the 90,000 mark, the single-day liquidation exceeded 470 million, and many traders took profits during the chase and panic selling. In such market conditions, frequent trading often does more harm than good.

I decided to run a comparative test. Using 1,000 units of crypto assets as initial capital, I selected 5 top accounts with different styles. Each account followed with 200 units, and a 7-day cycle was set to observe actual performance. As of the close on January 8, the total position reached 1,150 units, with a cumulative net profit of 15%. In the current liquidity-tight market environment, this result is quite good.

Breaking down the specific data:

The first account follows a steady compound interest strategy, with highly diversified holdings. It maintained its anti-dip characteristics during this adjustment, serving as a stabilizer in volatile markets.

The second account mainly trades mainstream coins in swing trading, with precise timing. Its return rate reached 9.85% (corresponding to 219.7 units). The downside is occasional chasing highs, but stop-loss execution is very decisive. Overall, it adopts an aggressive yet relatively stable approach.

The third account is good at capturing short-term rebound opportunities. Its trading frequency isn't high, but its hit rate is quite good. The return rate is 7.85% (215.7 units), making it suitable for traders who want quick profits while avoiding high-frequency trading fees.

The fourth account has a conservative style, with 213.8 units and a 6.9% return. It holds positions for a relatively longer period, with volatility significantly lower than the previous accounts.

From this small-scale test, different strategies indeed show obvious differences within the same period. Choosing the right follower is much more stable than blindly trading on your own.