In 20 years, looking back, one Bitcoin and three Bitcoins really don't make much difference. Frankly, both scenarios ultimately lead to the same result—getting rich quickly. Having tens of millions of dollars is getting rich quickly, and having three times that amount is still getting rich quickly; the essence remains unchanged.

Here's an interesting phenomenon: if one Bitcoin doesn't meet your needs, then three Bitcoins probably won't either. Conversely, if three Bitcoins are enough, then you probably can't spend all of one Bitcoin. The logic in between is actually very simple—when the base amount is large enough, the multiple relationships between quantities become less important.

The most impressive thing about Bitcoin is right here. It doesn't belong to any one person, or you could say it belongs to everyone. This design concept is truly decentralization in the real sense. No one can have absolute control over it, and this is its core value.