Are you also experiencing this dilemma—constantly swinging between the lock-up periods of slisBNB, the new coin mechanism of clisBNB, and the market fluctuations of LISTA, trying your best to adjust your allocations, yet the returns from the liquidity pool always hit a ceiling? Think carefully, the root cause isn't actually in the strategy itself, but a seriously overlooked issue: the rights and benefits you choose don't match your actual needs at all.

Many people's approach is like this—copy what others do, mechanically combine slisBNB, clisBNB, and LISTA, treating them as universal tools. But what are the consequences of doing so? Short-term liquidity needed for operations gets locked up in long-term staking; instead of stable returns, all-in on the most volatile tokens; wanting to participate in new coin projects frequently but being blocked due to insufficient credit limits. In the end, not only do you fail to make money, but these conflicts also cause liquidity crises. This is called operating for the sake of operation—seemingly aggressive on the surface, but in reality, funds are circulating inefficiently, and annualized returns are stuck below 40% for years.

True operational experts think in reverse—first clarify what your actual needs are, then choose the appropriate rights and benefits tools. In other words, let the rights adapt to the scenario, not the scenario to the rights. How to do this specifically? slisBNB is suitable as a long-term underlying asset, providing stable returns with risk protection; clisBNB is flexible addition, improving capital turnover efficiency while capturing credit premiums; LISTA is the key to high-yield surges, which can significantly boost overall returns if used well, but the premise is that risks are controllable. Place each of these three types of rights in the right position, so each can发挥 its intended value, and only then can the liquidity pool truly unleash its potential.