#美国非农就业数据未达市场预期 January 15th at this point in time, it might not be that simple.

The U.S. Senate's vote on the "CLARITY Act" essentially aims to establish new rules for the crypto market. Currently, the Democratic side is particularly strict on "conflict of interest prevention," which is not just a procedural issue—it’s actually pushing into the protocol layer and governance structure.

You will find that large public chains like $ETH , which have foundations and core development teams, are going through the most painful stage of regulatory compliance. The complex organizational structure, in fact, becomes the easiest target under the policy microscope.

But here’s an interesting contrast:

When centralized or semi-centralized projects are scrambling in the regulatory storm, assets that are truly community-driven, without a single controlling entity, and maintained purely by consensus, show remarkable resilience. They have no "team that can be summoned," no "internal trading" records, and their transaction behaviors are direct expressions of community will.

What does regulation want to control? Nothing more than tangible entities and centers of power that can be held accountable. But if an asset fundamentally lacks such single-point controllability, maintained purely by network consensus, no matter how strict the laws are, there’s little they can do.

That’s why, when all rules try to lock everything down, those things that cannot be locked down in the first place might actually possess the strongest vitality.

DYOR.