2026-01-10 15:22:12

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee has set January 16 for the CLARITY Act markup session. This move accelerates deliberations on several critical fronts: how DeFi platforms should be overseen, whether stablecoin yields need regulatory caps, and whether the CFTC should take the lead in spot-market regulation. However, significant disagreements remain unresolved—lawmakers continue sparring over enforcement mechanisms, anti-money laundering requirements, and ethical considerations around crypto market structure. These decisions could reshape how decentralized finance operates and which regulator ultimately has jurisdiction over digital asset trading.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnluckyLemur

· 23h ago

Is the markup happening on January 16th? These people are still arguing about AML, enforcement mechanisms, and stablecoin caps... I really don't know who will finally make the decision. CFTC or SEC? Betting $5 that CFTC will pass the buck. If this actually goes through, DeFi will be cut in half.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-10 15:41

The markup meeting on January 16th... Basically, it's a competition over who gets to set the rules, right? Data shows that the probability of the CFTC taking over the spot market is increasing, but AML remains a black box, and efficiency is concerning. Stablecoin yield caps? Isn't this directly cutting into arbitrage opportunities? Historical data indicates that once regulation intervenes, yields typically decline by over 35%. We need to do the math on this. The DeFi regulatory framework hasn't been implemented yet, and now there's internal conflict. I just want to know when we'll see an optimal solution... The fee structures on link can be optimized, so why can't these folks figure it out? The rule ambiguity period actually presents hedging opportunities. Whoever figures out the enforcement mechanism's logical details first will be the one to get ahead.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 01-10 15:37

Here we go again with this? Regulatory agencies passing the buck, and our dfi still has to lie flat and wait.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 01-10 15:37

The CLARITY Act is causing trouble again. What does January 16th mean? Is DeFi really about to be locked in...

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 01-10 15:34

Here comes another round of regulatory drama, with a vote scheduled for January 16. To put it simply, it's still bickering—questions like how to regulate DeFi, whether to restrict stablecoin yields, and who leads the CFTC... these issues lack consensus, and the lawmakers are each saying their own.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-10 15:28

January 16th, it's finally coming, feels like we're going to go through it all over again. Restrictions on stablecoin yields? What are these people thinking? Can the CFTC really regulate spot markets well? Honestly, I’m not optimistic. Who will regulate DeFi this time? No one seems capable of handling it. Regulators are still arguing with each other; let's just continue to lie low. Basically, it's a power struggle. What does it have to do with us? Hopefully, this time it won't turn into a mess again. Waiting to see which regulatory agency will ultimately dominate.

View OriginalReply0