Looking at storage projects like Walrus, I increasingly feel that they shouldn't be evaluated with a short-term mindset. Storage infrastructure fundamentally isn't driven by hype; it's about the frequency of being repeatedly called upon. It's okay if there's no discussion today; it might not be reliable even if the next trend arrives—what matters most is whether it can truly be put to use.



So I now have a habit: when evaluating, I consider three time horizons for myself: What will happen in one month? Six months? What will it become after a year?

Let's start with the one-month cycle. During this period, the most realistic development isn't a killer app suddenly appearing, but developers starting to test the waters on a small scale. What does testing look like? It’s not about grand product launches, but about someone beginning to integrate it into existing applications, starting with the smallest features—like migrating data of large objects from makeshift solutions to see if stability, access control, and referencing methods can run smoothly.

I pay more attention to whether the ecosystem starts to see more small actions like "conveniently storing blobs in the storage layer." These accumulated small actions are more indicative than a big news headline.

Moving to the six-month mark. Six months is a watershed; at this point, it reveals who has truly stuck around. Many projects look great early on, but once incentives stop, their true nature is exposed. So, my focus after six months becomes very specific:

First, whether genuine paid usage has appeared. It doesn't need to be large-scale, but there should be ongoing actual consumption. Second, the node operators. Can those running nodes provide stable services? Will they start to drop out as profits decline?

The one-year period is about whether it has become an "invisible standard" within a certain ecosystem. Not necessarily everyone discussing it, but quite the opposite—good infrastructure should be naturally called upon, just like no one specifically discusses TCP/IP. If after a year developers reflexively use it for data storage when building applications, then it has truly become alive.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetectivevip
· 19h ago
Well said, genuine paid content is the true mirror to see through illusions.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 19h ago
That's right, infrastructure is all about whether it gets used; all the hype is just superficial. Without incentives, nodes will just run away—that trick has been seen too many times. The idea of three time checkpoints is good, but the real key is whether developers will actually use it. No hype, no black, just see if there is real paid usage after six months—that's the real indicator. The biggest test for projects like this is natural ecosystem calls; otherwise, even the most impressive data is just an illusion. Seamless integration is crucial; small actions accumulate to show the real picture, not just the launch event. My only criterion is whether it becomes a conditioned reflex for developers—if not, then it's not promising. The phrase "Incentives reveal true colors" really hits the point; I've seen too many lively projects fade away once the excitement dies down. Infrastructure doesn't need debate; it needs to be used. Once you understand this, you won't chase after high prices anymore. Let's see if, after a year, it becomes something everyone uses but no one mentions.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 19h ago
To be honest, I quite agree with the logic of these three time checkpoints, especially the observation of "conveniently putting the blob into the storage layer"—it's definitely more reliable than any fundraising news. However, I still want to see Walrus's milestone data after half a year. The incentive mechanism is the most likely place to be exposed. Whether this set of things can truly settle down depends mainly on whether developers will actually use it, rather than just joining the hype for popularity.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)