Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
$ZEC ZEC yesterday plunged 30%, and my message inbox instantly exploded.
"Did the project team run away?" "Is this coin completely finished?"
Alright, I can memorize this kind of reaction. In the crypto circle, whenever the price drops, the first reaction is always that the team is in trouble. This kind of thinking has become a conditioned reflex, but honestly, what happened with Zcash is far from that simple.
I have been studying crypto governance for years and dare to guarantee: this is not a project collapse, but a very necessary "structural pain." From a different perspective, Zcash is going through a hurdle that all ambitious crypto projects cannot avoid—the transformation from a small workshop to a formal organization. Just like teenagers need to break free from their parents' control to grow up, crypto projects also need to shed outdated governance constraints.
**Governance is distorted, more deadly than code vulnerabilities**
Many people put the success or failure of crypto projects entirely on technology. But I tell you, the real trouble often isn't in the code, but in governance.
The core issue with Zcash is this: two factions want the project to make money and free itself from donations, but they completely disagree on "how to make money." The destructive power of this collapse in consensus is far greater than any technical bug.
The Bank for International Settlements has long exposed a truth: the so-called "full decentralization" is an illusion; governance inherently requires some degree of centralized decision-making. Zcash's non-profit governance framework protected the project's technical purity in the early days, but once the project needs funding, expansion, user recruitment, and real commercial implementation, this system becomes a huge burden.
Want funding? You have to pass through layers of donation approvals. Want rapid iteration? You have to wait for agreements from all parties. It's like trying to run a long-distance cross-country trip with a human-powered tricycle—no matter how carefully designed, it can't keep up with the market pace. Is the coin possibly dropping to double digits?