Agents built on $KREDO operate without holding private keys or account balances—a design that eliminates honeypot risks entirely. Security comes through cryptographic enforcement of permissions, each with strict operational limits and integrated zero-knowledge privacy layers.



But here's where it gets interesting: the protocol enables shared liquidity pools. Multiple agents can execute transactions against the same capital base simultaneously, essentially multiplying the efficiency of a single liquidity source. This means thousands of autonomous agents can coordinate operations across shared pools without conflicts or redundancy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LostBetweenChainsvip
· 3h ago
No private keys, no balances—that's what an agent should look like. Finally, someone has thought through security thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 10h ago
No hype, no negativity. This architecture and logic are quite impressive... The keyless design directly kills the honeypot. I just want to know if it will crash when scaled up massively.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 10h ago
Relying without private keys? That's a pretty clever design; the honeypot risk is completely eliminated.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 10h ago
ngl, this shared liquidity pools design is pretty impressive; it feels like it could push gas fees to the limit.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 10h ago
An agent design without private keys and balances sounds good, but can a shared liquidity pool truly coordinate without conflicts? There must be some pitfalls I haven't thought of.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresentvip
· 10h ago
Not checking private keys, this architecture is quite thoughtful. The old tricks of honeypots finally don't work anymore. --- Sharing liquidity pools sounds good, but can it truly be conflict-free and coordinated? It depends on how it performs in practice. --- Wow, a thousand agents operating a single fund pool simultaneously? Could this become a new single point of failure? --- Zero-knowledge proofs combined with permission restrictions seem quite complex. How is simplicity ensured? --- At first glance, efficiency seems to double, but is multi-agent concurrency really that smooth? I have a feeling there might be pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHolevip
· 10h ago
No need to manage private keys yourself? This design is a bit extreme, directly eliminating the honeypot risk... I've thought about the shared liquidity pool, and while it can indeed boost efficiency, what if an agent goes rogue? If this thing really gets off the ground, it feels like it could rewrite the entire DeFi gameplay.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)