Many people see "decentralized storage" and instinctively equate it with cloud drives, then start to worry about costs—how much does it cost per GB on this platform, and how much on that one? But if you look at Walrus from this perspective, you're basically going off track. Frankly speaking, Walrus isn't playing the price war; it aims to solve a more fundamental problem: ensuring the true availability of data.



The difference lies in the nature of trust.

**Why is traditional storage called "trusting people"?**

When you use services like Alibaba Cloud or Amazon, what is the core reliance? It's simply trusting that their data centers won't have issues, your data won't be deleted, and the service will always be online. This kind of trust ultimately depends on a centralized entity. No matter how good their promises sound, they are just a contractual guarantee.

What has Walrus done? It completely reverses this logic—shifting trust from "entity promises" to "mathematical guarantees."

When you store data on the Walrus network, what you receive isn't a simple download link. You get a "data availability certificate" on the blockchain. This certificate can be understood as follows: the entire Sui network uses erasure coding algorithms and node distribution mechanisms as guarantees, ensuring that your data can be verified and retrieved anytime, anywhere. This isn't a promise from a company; it's secured by mathematical logic and network consensus.

**The collision of two trust models**

One is "I trust this organization," and the other is "I trust this mechanism." The former can be easily broken by a single point of failure; the latter's credibility comes from open, transparent algorithms and a decentralized network structure.

This is what Walrus truly aims to change.
SUI-0.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpAnalystvip
· 10h ago
Hmm, this logic sounds pretty good, but I still want to see the actual operational data of the Sui network nodes before commenting. Don't be fooled. Mathematical guarantees sound solid, but what if the nodes really go down? Who will compensate? This explanation is relatively clear-headed; it's not exactly selling cheap goods, but we need to watch out for how the project team might cut corners later. It feels like they're just whitewashing Walrus, but this perspective does hit the pain points of traditional cloud storage. On-chain proof sounds like old wine in a new bottle; the technical aspects still need market verification. The support level is based on erasure coding algorithms. Once this is broken, the entire logic collapses. Risk control must be well managed.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 10h ago
Ah, finally someone clarified it: not all decentralized storage is Cloud Drive 2.0 Mathematical guarantees vs a paper contract, the difference is really significant
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 10h ago
ngl the erasure coding angle here is actually the inefficiency vector most people miss—they're stuck in the costpillars debate when the real alpha is in the availability guarantees thru protocol mechanics, not some corp's sla theatre
Reply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5vip
· 10h ago
Wow, this is the true Web3 approach, not just about competing on price. The fundamental difference in trust mechanisms is explained very thoroughly. From "trusting people" to "trusting mathematics," this transition is indeed impressive. Contracts? Haha, algorithms are more reliable anyway. Walrus's approach is much more advanced than those storage projects that just compete on price. Data availability certificates—that's real decentralized assurance. Using erasure coding combined with node distribution is indeed more convincing than centralized services. I used to misunderstand decentralized storage, only thinking about cost issues. Looking at Walrus this way, it's truly a mechanism innovation.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 10h ago
Wow, someone finally explained this thoroughly. I used to confuse Walrus with IPFS and others, but now I understand — the key isn't about price at all, it's about the underlying trust logic.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)