Most of us rely on mainstream wallets like Phantom, MetaMask, Ledger for asset management. They're solid, no doubt. But here's the thing—when you actually need to move or receive tokens with some privacy layer, you're forced to look elsewhere and use privacy-focused swap tools.



It's weird, right? Why aren't native privacy features built into these wallets by default? The infrastructure exists. Users clearly want it. Yet the big players keep pushing the same transparent-by-default model.

Feel like we're overdue for a proper private mode rollout. The question isn't if it'll happen, but when.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ArbitrageBotvip
· 9h ago
This is just outrageous. Big wallets not enabling privacy features is really pretending to be asleep.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperervip
· 15h ago
Phantom, MetaMask and other big companies just don't want to give us privacy features, it's really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetectorvip
· 15h ago
To be honest, big wallets should have integrated privacy features long ago. Relying on third-party swap tools has been too inefficient.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 15h ago
Damn, this is outrageous. The big wallets are pretending not to understand that users want privacy.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 15h ago
Big companies are like this—acting tech-savvy when they’re not, and locking down privacy features so tightly that we have to tinker with privacy mixers ourselves.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)