Recently participated in a DAO voting process, from proposal to results, the entire process was completed in just two days. Compared to other DAO projects I’ve encountered before, where the discussion phase alone can drag on for half a month, this experience was completely different.

They make decisions using engineering thinking—direct and efficient. Although it lacks some warmth, the results are clear. 350,000 tokens are allocated weekly to ve holders, with an annualized return of up to 38%. Such stable income distribution cycles are indeed rare.

What’s even more interesting is their deflationary logic. In August last year, 20% of the circulating supply was burned, reducing 1 billion tokens directly to 800 million. This isn’t just a gimmick—it's like drilling a hole at the bottom of a full pond; the continuous outflow pressure changes the entire ecosystem’s dynamics.

The lending protocol is also worth noting. It features a standard collateralized borrowing model with dynamically adjusted interest rates, along with a forced liquidation mechanism and third-party security audits. The entire risk control logic is laid out, and from the project operation perspective, it’s clearly evolving towards infrastructure.

Whoever can turn themselves into a channel will hold the future of this track. This governance mechanism itself might be the direction that DeFi should explore.